North Dakota Senate Bill SB2249

North Dakota 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/13/23
• Refer: 1/13/23
• Report Pass: 2/17/23
• Engrossed: 2/21/23
• Refer: 2/22/23
• Report Pass: 3/30/23
• Enrolled: 4/10/23
• Passed: 4/13/23

Caption

The efficiency of administration of occupational boards; to provide for a report to the legislative management; and to provide an effective date.

Summary

Senate Bill 2249 aims to enhance the efficiency of the administration of occupational boards in North Dakota. It introduces a new chapter to Title 34 of the North Dakota Century Code, focusing on streamlining the process for licensing out-of-state practitioners and revising continuing education requirements. The bill tasks the labor commissioner with gathering information on current practices, establishing a strategy to improve efficiency, and possibly suggesting new legislation to the legislative assembly during the next session based on these findings. This initiative reflects an intent to modernize and respond to the evolving needs of the workforce in the state. The impact of SB2249 on state laws is significant as it proposes changes to how occupational licensing operates, particularly concerning out-of-state applicants. The strategy aims to potentially allow for the licensing of such practitioners within three business days of application. Additionally, it seeks to update continuing education requirements to better recognize contributions from employers and technological advancements. By doing so, the bill represents a step towards making North Dakota's workforce more adaptable and accessible. Sentiment surrounding SB2249 appears to be generally positive, with no recorded opposition during voting; it passed the Senate with a unanimous vote of 47-0, indicating broad support among legislators. The bill's proponents likely see it as a necessary enhancement for the state’s professional landscape, potentially easing the burden on occupational boards and facilitating quicker integration of skilled workers into the workforce. This support reflects an understanding of the need for flexibility and responsiveness in regulatory practices. While there are no notable points of contention reported in the legislative debates or voting records, the focus on efficiency and modernization could prompt discussions around the balance between regulatory measures and the need for thorough vetting of practitioners. As the bill moves towards implementation, stakeholders may explore how these changes will affect local standards and the quality of services provided by licensed individuals.