North Dakota Senate Bill SB2293

North Dakota 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/16/23
• Refer: 1/16/23
• Refer: 1/18/23
• Report DNP: 1/25/23
• Refer: 1/26/23
• Refer: 2/9/23
• Report Pass: 2/13/23
• Engrossed: 2/15/23
• Refer: 2/17/23
• Report Pass: 3/15/23
• Enrolled: 3/22/23
• Passed: 3/28/23

Caption

An income tax deduction for military pay; and to provide an effective date.

Impact

The proposed changes will directly affect state tax laws, particularly those governing income tax deductions. If enacted, SB2293 would provide financial relief to active-duty military members and veterans who reside in North Dakota. This amendment is expected to encourage military service by making it financially beneficial for individuals serving their country. Additionally, it aligns the state's tax policies with a growing recognition of the financial challenges faced by service members and their families.

Summary

Senate Bill 2293 seeks to amend the North Dakota Century Code to provide an income tax deduction for military pay received by individuals who are members of the armed forces, including the National Guard and reserves, during their federal active duty service. This legislation aims to alleviate some of the tax burden on service members by allowing them to deduct military pay that is included in their taxable income for state purposes. By doing so, it recognizes the unique contributions and sacrifices made by military personnel.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB2293 appears to be supportive, particularly among legislators and constituents who advocate for military service members' rights and benefits. The bill garnered a strong vote of support in the Senate, evidencing a consensus on the need to support those who serve in the armed forces. However, there may still be concerns regarding the fiscal impact of such tax deductions on the state's budget, which could lead to debates about fiscal responsibility and prioritization of tax benefits.

Contention

While SB2293 has broad support, some points of contention may arise regarding the extent of the tax benefits provided and their implications for state revenue. Critics might argue that while the intent is noble, such tax deductions could complicate the tax code and lead to budgetary constraints. Additionally, discussions may also delve into whether similar considerations should be extended to non-active duty veterans and how to equitably distribute tax benefits among different demographics within the military community.