North Dakota Senate Bill SB2334

North Dakota 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/16/23
• Refer: 1/16/23
• Report Pass: 1/25/23
• Engrossed: 1/27/23
• Refer: 2/17/23
• Report Pass: 3/8/23
• Enrolled: 4/27/23
• Passed: 4/29/23

Caption

A sales tax exemption for a fertilizer plant and allocation of sales tax revenue; to provide a continuing appropriation; to provide for a legislative management report; and to provide an expiration date.

Impact

The bill is expected to facilitate the growth of the fertilizer and chemical processing industries in the state by providing financial incentives to local governments that receive a portion of the sales tax revenue. This mechanism is meant to support infrastructure, public safety, and economic development initiatives related to these large facilities. By creating the large facility development fund, the state aims to enhance local investment and foster job creation in these sectors. The fund is structured to have a sunset provision, expiring on June 30, 2027, which encourages timely utilization of the resources.

Summary

Senate Bill 2334 addresses economic development through the establishment of a large facility development fund in North Dakota. The bill aims to distribute funding to counties or cities that are impacted by the construction of large fertilizer or chemical processing plants. If construction begins on a qualifying facility, the state treasurer is mandated to distribute to the respective county or city an amount equal to one percent of the estimated cost of tangible property. The bill also modifies existing tax exemption provisions related to such facilities, requiring them to meet specific criteria to qualify for these benefits.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB2334 appears to be generally positive among its proponents, who view it as a catalyst for economic growth and development within the state. Supporters highlight the potential benefits of attracting significant investments and creating jobs through new facilities. However, there are concerns among some local leaders and constituents about the long-term effects of such tax incentives and whether they adequately address the needs of the communities involved.

Contention

Contention exists around the potential implications of the bill on local governance authority and the sustainability of the financial commitments made through the fund. Some critics are wary that while the bill may provide immediate financial benefits, it may also lead to increased reliance on revenue generated from large facilities without ensuring that such facilities contribute positively to the community in the long run. The balance between incentivizing business development and maintaining local control over fiscal priorities remains a point of discussion.