North Dakota House Bill HB1230

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/13/25
• Refer: 1/13/25

Caption

The administration of a federally sponsored animal identification program by the state veterinarian; and to repeal sections 4.1-72-05 and 4.1-72-06 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating the administration of a federally sponsored animal identification program and records relating to the program.

Impact

This legislation significantly alters the framework governing animal identification in North Dakota. By consolidating the responsibilities under a single state official, the bill may provide a streamlined approach to animal tracking and disease control related to livestock. The repealing of certain sections of the North Dakota Century Code reflects a shift toward enforcing stricter control over how information is managed and shared within this federally authorized program. This could enhance regulatory compliance and improve responses to animal disease outbreaks by ensuring timely and secure handling of information.

Summary

House Bill 1230 focuses on the administration of a federally sponsored animal identification program, assigning the state veterinarian as the key administrator for this initiative. The bill aims to amend existing sections within the North Dakota Century Code, giving the state veterinarian specific responsibilities in relation to premises identification and tracking of animals like cattle, horses, and mules. Notably, the bill establishes regulations regarding the confidentiality of the information collected, ensuring that personal details related to animal ownership are protected unless certain legal conditions are met for disclosure.

Contention

One area of concern surrounding HB 1230 relates to the balance between transparency and privacy. Although supporters argue that the bill improves the management of animal identification systems, critics may worry about the implications of limiting public access to certain records. The confidential nature of the data may hinder the ability of stakeholders, including farmers and consumers, to access vital information regarding animal health and safety protocols. This tension underscores the broader debate of regulatory oversight versus individual rights within agricultural practices.