North Dakota House Bill HB1301

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/13/25
• Refer: 1/13/25
• Refer: 1/15/25
• Report DNP: 2/13/25

Caption

Possession of a firearm while on probation; and to provide for application.

Impact

This legislation aims to provide clearer guidelines for courts in determining the conditions of probation, especially concerning firearm possession. By allowing courts to waive firearm prohibitions under certain circumstances, the bill seeks to strike a balance between maintaining public safety and recognizing the rights of non-violent offenders. However, the bill specifically precludes the waiver of firearm possession for those whose offenses involved violence, thereby enhancing controls for more serious offenses.

Summary

House Bill 1301 proposes amendments to the North Dakota Century Code regarding the conditions of firearm possession for individuals on probation. The new regulations stipulate that courts must impose a general condition barring defendants from possessing firearms while on probation, unless certain criteria are met, such as if the offense is a first-time misdemeanor. With these amendments, the court may waive the prohibition under specific conditions and must establish a finding of good cause on record before allowing gun possession.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1301 appears to be mixed. Proponents of the bill argue that it offers necessary flexibility to judges, enabling them to craft probation conditions that are appropriate for individual circumstances, particularly for first-time offenders. Conversely, critics may express concerns about the potential risks associated with waiving firearm restrictions, emphasizing the importance of public safety and the need for strict oversight on firearm possession by individuals currently under probation supervision.

Contention

One notable point of contention is the potential for varying interpretations of what constitutes 'good cause' for waiving the firearm prohibition. This aspect raises questions about consistency in judicial decisions and how different courts may apply the law. Furthermore, discussions surrounding public safety implications will likely persist, especially among advocacy groups focused on reducing gun violence, who might argue that any allowance for firearm possession among probationers could lead to increased risks.