North Dakota House Bill HB1305

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/13/25
• Refer: 1/13/25
• Report Pass: 2/11/25
• Engrossed: 2/14/25
• Refer: 2/17/25
• Report Pass: 3/24/25
• Enrolled: 4/9/25
• Passed: 4/18/25

Caption

Criminal trespass; and to provide a penalty.

Impact

The bill significantly reforms how trespass laws operate in North Dakota by introducing a tiered penalty structure. This aims to empower property owners and increase accountability for individuals who fail to respect property boundaries. With differentiated severity of offenses, the bill may lead to an increase in reported trespassing incidents due to better-defined legal frameworks for property rights violations. The legislature expects these changes to improve community safety and protect private property rights, aligning laws with current societal expectations regarding private property.

Summary

House Bill 1305 aims to amend existing statutes related to criminal trespass in North Dakota. The bill delineates specific penalties based on the type of trespass committed, ranging from a class C felony for unauthorized entry into a dwelling to a class A misdemeanor for remaining on posted property after being directed to leave. This legislation is intended to provide clearer definitions of trespassing offenses and enhance penalties to deter such activities, thereby reinforcing property rights and the authority of property owners.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 1305 appears to be overwhelmingly positive, with legislators expressing strong support for the need to safeguard property rights. Given that the voting records show unanimous support (89-0 in the House and 47-0 in the Senate), it reflects a bipartisan agreement on the importance of making trespassing laws more stringent and easier to enforce. Nevertheless, concerns linger regarding the potential expansion of law enforcement powers and the impact on individuals who may inadvertently trespass without malicious intent.

Contention

Notably, the bill raised discussions about the balance between protecting property rights and ensuring due process for individuals accused of trespassing. While supporters argue that property owners need more tools to prevent trespassing, critics worry about the implications of increased penalties and whether they adequately account for situations where individuals may have legitimate reasons for being on private property. The debate highlighted concerns around potential overreach in penal laws and the need to assess individual circumstances in trespassing cases.