North Dakota House Bill HB1460

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/16/25
• Refer: 1/16/25
• Report Pass: 2/18/25
• Engrossed: 2/21/25
• Refer: 2/24/25
• Report Pass: 3/25/25
• Enrolled: 4/22/25
• Passed: 4/29/25

Caption

Substitute caregiver and respite care provider requirements in foster homes for adults and the permitted use of an electronic monitoring device by an adult foster care provider; and to provide for a legislative management study.

Impact

The bill is expected to significantly impact state laws regarding adult caregiving by clarifying and expanding the roles of substitute caregivers and respite care providers. By establishing minimum service delivery standards, it aims to alleviate workforce shortages in adult foster care and improve service continuity. Additionally, the permission to use monitoring devices may encourage more providers to accept residents requiring assistance while ensuring their safety, thus, potentially increasing the number of available facilities for adults in need.

Summary

House Bill 1460 aims to establish regulations surrounding substitute caregivers and respite care providers in adult foster homes in North Dakota. Specifically, it introduces requirements for these providers and permits the use of electronic monitoring devices to ensure resident safety. This legislative move is seen as an effort to streamline care options for adults who need such services, enhancing the availability of qualified personnel within private pay settings.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment regarding HB 1460 is largely positive among legislators and stakeholders in the health sector. Supporters view the bill as a necessary step to enhance the care infrastructure for adults, especially those with disabilities. Nevertheless, there may be concerns regarding the breadth of regulatory oversight and the implications of electronic monitoring, which could raise questions about privacy and the quality of care.

Contention

While the bill has largely moved forward with consensus among legislators—evidenced by a solid majority in both chambers—there are notable points of contention. Those skeptical of the monitoring provision may argue about the balance between safety and privacy for residents. Furthermore, discussions surrounding the proposed legislative management study indicate an ongoing dialogue about the limitations of current regulations in the adult caregiving landscape and the need for additional support mechanisms for providers and caregivers in this domain.