North Dakota Senate Bill SB2240

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/17/25
• Refer: 1/17/25
• Report DNP: 2/17/25

Caption

Theft of property; and to provide a penalty.

Impact

If enacted, SB2240 would significantly impact the procedures local governments must follow when dealing with personal property. This legislation is intended to safeguard property owners by mandating clear communication and ensuring that they are directly informed about potential seizures. By introducing these requirements, the bill intends to enhance transparency and accountability of governmental actions involving personal property, which could lead to a reduction in unlawful or abrupt property confiscation incidents. This change would require local authorities to adjust their protocols and practices in handling property disputes.

Summary

Senate Bill 2240 aims to amend the North Dakota Century Code regarding the seizure of personal property by political subdivisions, including home rule cities and counties. The bill introduces a requirement for governmental authorities to provide written notice to property owners before seizing their belongings. This notice can be given in person or via certified mail. Additionally, the bill stipulates that authorities must receive the owner's signature acknowledging receipt of this notice prior to any seizure action. This amendment seeks to protect individual property rights against unauthorized confiscation by governmental entities.

Contention

Notably, the discussion surrounding SB2240 highlights a dichotomy between advocates for greater property protections and those who feel that this bill may complicate legitimate governmental actions. Proponents argue that this law is essential for protecting citizens from overreach by local governments, ensuring that personal property rights are respected. Critics might contend that such regulations could delay necessary governmental actions in emergencies or reduce the efficiency of a political subdivision's ability to act swiftly in certain situations, raising questions about creating potential loopholes for individuals seeking to evade lawful property seizure.