North Dakota Senate Bill SB2313

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/20/25
• Refer: 1/20/25
• Report DNP: 2/18/25

Caption

Reclamation of land disturbed by oil and gas activity.

Impact

The implications of SB2313 are significant for both the oil and gas industry and environmental stewardship within the state. By mandating a reclamation process, the bill aims to mitigate the environmental impacts associated with oil and gas activities. This could lead to enhanced protection of natural resources and lands, ensuring that the state maintains its ecological integrity after exploitation. Additionally, landowners are afforded a say in the planning process through required pre-disturbance meetings, though their active participation is not mandated.

Summary

Senate Bill 2313 focuses on the reclamation of land disturbed by oil and gas activities in North Dakota. This legislation seeks to amend existing sections of the North Dakota Century Code to ensure that the land is restored as closely as possible to its original condition following any disturbances caused by oil and gas construction, including well sites and access roads. The bill outlines requirements for documenting and preserving suitable plant growth material that may be disturbed during the construction process, thus emphasizing environmental responsibility in the oil and gas industry.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB2313 is mixed. Proponents argue that the bill represents a necessary step towards responsible land management and environmental protection. They contend that reclaiming land disturbed by oil and gas activities is fundamentally important for preserving North Dakota’s natural landscape. Conversely, opponents might raise concerns about the implications for economic activity, arguing that additional regulations could hinder oil and gas exploration and extraction business operations.

Contention

A notable point of contention arises from the provision allowing the commission to waive reclamation requirements with the consent of landowners or relevant authorities. Critics might view this as a potential loophole that could undermine the intended environmental protections. Furthermore, there are concerns over the administrative procedures outlined in the bill, as potential legal actions are restricted unless all administrative remedies have been exhausted, which could limit the recourse for affected parties.