North Dakota Senate Bill SB2327

North Dakota 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/20/25
• Refer: 1/20/25
• Report Pass: 2/3/25
• Refer: 2/3/25
• Report Pass: 2/20/25
• Engrossed: 2/24/25
• Refer: 3/7/25
• Report Pass: 3/17/25
• Refer: 3/18/25
• Report Pass: 4/15/25
• Enrolled: 4/21/25
• Passed: 4/23/25

Caption

Uses of the agriculture diversification and development fund and committee; to provide an appropriation; and to provide for a transfer.

Impact

If enacted, SB 2327 will fundamentally bolster the financial framework supporting agriculture-related initiatives in North Dakota. With a dedicated appropriation of $15 million for the biennium starting July 1, 2025, the bill aims to stimulate growth in sectors such as food production, processing, and animal agriculture. The continuous funding model encourages sustained investment in agricultural innovation and job creation, which advocates believe is essential for maintaining the competitiveness of local agricultural producers and contributing to the state's economy.

Summary

Senate Bill 2327 seeks to amend provisions related to the Agriculture Diversification and Development Fund and its overseeing committee in North Dakota. It outlines the creation and continuous appropriation of a fund designated for loans, interest rate buydowns, and grants aimed at supporting the growth of value-added agriculture businesses. The bill emphasizes the enhancement of profitability for farmers and ranchers, as well as the creation of jobs and overall economic development in the state. Furthermore, it details the composition and responsibilities of the Agriculture Diversification and Development Committee, which is tasked with reviewing grant applications and establishing eligibility criteria for funding.

Sentiment

The sentiment in the legislature appears largely supportive of SB 2327, reflecting a collective recognition of agriculture's critical role in North Dakota's economy. Proponents highlight the necessity of such funding to address the challenges faced by farmers and the agricultural sector as a whole. While there were some dissenting opinions during discussions, particularly concerning the allocation of substantial funds, overall, the bill garnered significant support from both the Senate and House, as indicated by the majority votes during its legislative process.

Contention

Notable points of contention against SB 2327 may revolve around the prioritization of funding and potential implications for smaller and less-established agricultural businesses. Critics may raise concerns about the decision-making process of the Agriculture Diversification and Development Committee and the extent to which the bill addresses the diverse needs of the state's agricultural community. Ensuring that the funding benefits a wide array of stakeholders without favoring larger agribusinesses will be crucial for maintaining equity and support within the agricultural sector.