New Hampshire House Bill HB1375

New Hampshire 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 11/20/21
• Refer: 11/20/21
• Report Pass: 3/4/22
• Engrossed: 3/22/22
• Refer: 3/22/22
• Report Pass: 4/20/22

Caption

Relative to the definition of veteran.

Impact

The amendments proposed in HB 1375 affect several sections of the New Hampshire Revised Statutes, particularly those referencing veterans’ qualifications for employment and benefits. Specifically, the bill amends RSA 21:50, redefining criteria that grant employment preferences to veterans in public sectors and altering tax exemptions for disabled veterans. As a result, the updates are intended to extend better support mechanisms to a larger group of individuals who have served in the military.

Summary

House Bill 1375 aims to amend the existing definition of 'veteran' in New Hampshire law. The proposed bill broadens the criteria for what constitutes a veteran, allowing any discharge under honorable conditions to be included as a qualifying status. This change is significant as it could affect various veterans' benefits and protections under state law, including employment opportunities and tax exemptions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1375 appears to be largely positive among proponents who advocate for a more inclusive definition of veterans. Many argue that this change reflects a necessary modernization of the legal framework surrounding veteran affairs in the state, aligning it better with contemporary perceptions of military service. However, some critics express concern that the broadening of the definition may inadvertently lead to challenges in verifying eligibility for certain benefits, which could complicate programmatic implementation.

Contention

Discussion around HB 1375 highlights notable points of contention regarding the precise implications of redefining eligibility for veterans. While supporters emphasize inclusivity, there are fears that such changes may lead to misunderstandings or administrative burden in determining which discharges qualify under 'honorable conditions.' This concern indicates a broader dialogue regarding the need for clear criteria and adequate resources to support implementation, ensuring that the intent of the bill translates effectively into practice.