New Hampshire House Bill HB1447

New Hampshire 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/1/21
• Refer: 12/1/21

Caption

Prohibiting state agencies from using face recognition technology.

Impact

The implementation of HB 1447 would have significant implications for state laws governing technology and privacy. It targets the use of a specific technology that has been criticized for its potential to infringe upon individual rights, especially in contexts where consent is not obtained. The bill effectively disallows the creation or maintenance of any facial recognition databases by state agencies, establishing a regulatory framework that prioritizes personal privacy in the digital age.

Summary

House Bill 1447 aims to prohibit state agencies from utilizing face recognition technology in their operations. This legislative move is seen as a proactive measure to protect citizens' privacy and civil liberties, amid growing concerns over the use of surveillance technologies by government entities. By disallowing the use of automated systems that can identify individuals based on their facial features, the bill seeks to limit potential overreach and misuse of technology by state authorities.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 1447 appears to be largely supportive among privacy advocates and civil liberties organizations who argue that the bill is a necessary step towards greater accountability and transparency in government actions. However, there may be concerns from law enforcement and security agencies about potential limitations this could impose on identifying suspects or preventing crime, reflecting a divide in perspective regarding the balance between public safety and individual rights.

Contention

A notable point of contention arises from the ongoing debate about the efficacy and ethical implications of surveillance technologies. Advocates for the bill argue that banning face recognition technology is crucial to ensure that the government does not engage in mass surveillance practices that could lead to profiling and unjust treatment of individuals. Conversely, opponents may argue that the absence of such technology could complicate law enforcement efforts, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of how to enhance privacy without hindering public safety.