New Hampshire House Bill HB1552

New Hampshire 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/14/21
• Refer: 12/14/21
• Report Pass: 2/8/22
• Refer: 3/4/22
• Report DNP: 3/24/22
• Report Pass: 3/24/22
• Engrossed: 4/5/22
• Refer: 4/5/22
• Refer: 4/20/22
• Enrolled: 6/14/22
• Chaptered: 6/29/22
• Passed: 6/29/22

Caption

Establishing a board for the certification of assessing persons.

Impact

The introduction of HB1552 is anticipated to standardize certification processes for assessors, improving the overall professionalism within the field. By formally transferring duties from the existing Assessing Standards Board to the new Assessing Certification Board, the bill seeks to streamline operations and ensure that only qualified individuals conduct assessments. This move is likely to have fiscal implications for both state and county governments, with increased state revenue projected from licensing fees and potential penalties for non-compliance.

Summary

House Bill 1552 (HB1552) establishes a new Assessing Certification Board within the New Hampshire Office of Professional Licensure and Certification. The board is tasked with overseeing the certification of assessing professionals who are responsible for municipal property taxation. The board will include a diverse membership composed of certified assessor supervisors, a member representing municipalities, and a member from the general public. This structure aims to enhance the quality and accountability of assessment practices in the state.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment around the bill appears to be supportive among stakeholders who advocate for enhanced professional standards in property assessment. Proponents argue that the certification process will raise the bar for assessors, ensuring fair and accurate property evaluations. However, there are concerns regarding the implications of creating additional regulatory frameworks and potential bureaucratic burdens that may arise from the establishment of the new board. Stakeholders express the need for clarity in operational procedures to prevent delays and ensure efficient governance.

Contention

While proponents emphasize the importance of accountability and standards in property assessment, critics raise concerns regarding the potential for over-regulation. There is apprehension that increased scrutiny and constraints on assessors could lead to fewer individuals entering the field, ultimately impacting assessment quality and local governance flexibility. As the board assumes authority to impose fines for violations, the balance between enforcement and practical applicability of new regulations remains a point of contention among stakeholders.