New Hampshire House Bill HB87

New Hampshire 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/4/21
• Refer: 1/4/21
• Report Pass: 11/16/21
• Report DNP: 11/16/21
• Engrossed: 1/18/22
• Refer: 1/18/22
• Refer: 4/6/22

Caption

Relative to the definition of electioneering.

Impact

The changes proposed in HB 87 directly affect RSA 652:16-h and RSA 659:43, substantially reshaping the landscape for electioneering within polling places. By defining the parameters of what constitutes election advocacy at polling stations, the bill seeks to maintain the integrity of the voting process while allowing voters the freedom to showcase their political affiliations as long as they are actively participating in the voting or registration process. For election officers and similar officials, the bill emphasizes a neutrality standard to be upheld while performing their duties.

Summary

House Bill 87 aims to amend the definition of electioneering in the context of New Hampshire elections. The bill specifically targets the actions of certain election officials, delineating what is considered electioneering behavior and stipulating the conditions under which eligible voters may display political apparel and materials at polling places. The key stipulation is that only designated election officials are prohibited from wearing items that could be seen as politically advocating for or against candidates, parties, or ballot measures during their duties at polling locations.

Contention

Discussions surrounding HB 87 reflect differing opinions on electioneering standards. Proponents argue that the bill introduces much-needed clarity to electioneering laws and protections for voters who may wish to express their political identities. However, critics may raise concerns about the limitations placed specifically on election officials, suggesting that such restrictions could infringe upon legitimate expressions of political identity and advocacy. The balance between maintaining a neutral voting environment and allowing political expression remains a significant point of contention in the legislative discourse.