New Hampshire Senate Bill SB414

New Hampshire 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/23/21
• Refer: 12/23/21
• Report Pass: 1/26/22
• Engrossed: 3/23/22
• Refer: 3/23/22
• Report Pass: 4/11/22
• Enrolled: 5/13/22
• Chaptered: 5/24/22
• Passed: 5/24/22

Caption

Relative to the definition of Alzheimer's disease and related disorders.

Impact

The impact of SB 414 extends beyond merely redefining a medical condition; it has practical implications for the provision of respite care services provided by the state. The Department of Health and Human Services is expected to see an increase in demand for respite care as more individuals become eligible under the newly expanded definition. The bill stipulates that this change will take effect on July 1, 2022, indicating a shift in how state resources will be allocated to support those requiring care and their caregivers. This amendment may lead to additional strains on funding, as existing budgets may not suffice to cater to the anticipated increase in caregiver needs.

Summary

Senate Bill 414 relates to the definition of Alzheimer's disease and related disorders (ADRD) in New Hampshire law. The bill amends RSA 161-F:66, I to broaden the criteria for what constitutes ADRD. This includes not only those who have a formal diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease but also individuals who exhibit symptoms of the disease or similar irreversible dementia that significantly affect their daily activities. By doing so, the bill aims to provide a more inclusive framework that recognizes the early signs of dementia, potentially allowing more individuals to receive assistance sooner in their care journey.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB 414 include concerns about the sufficiency of funding for the modified definition's implementation. With the Department noting past utilizations of respite funds and the insufficient appropriations of $327,000 for FY 2021 and subsequent years, there is apprehension regarding whether the state can handle the influx of new caregivers seeking aid. Advocacy groups may urge legislators to secure additional funding to avoid potential shortfalls that could thwart the bill's objectives. Furthermore, the bill may spark discussions about the broader implications of government definitions related to health conditions and their impact on eligibility for crucial support services.