The introduction of HB1113 signifies a direct impact on septic system management and water pollution regulations. By mandating that any transaction involving developed waterfront properties includes a septic system evaluation conducted by a licensed professional, it aims to ensure that potential environmental hazards associated with failing septic systems are addressed proactively. This change is likely to improve water quality and environmental standards along shorelines, ultimately aiding in the preservation of New Hampshire’s natural resources and ecosystems.
Summary
House Bill 1113 aims to modify the existing requirements regarding shoreland septic systems within the state of New Hampshire. The bill proposes changes to the definition of 'developed waterfront' properties, expanding the distance criterion from 200 to 250 feet from reference lines of water bodies. This amendment facilitates a clearer understanding of which properties are subject to stricter septic system evaluations and management under state laws. Furthermore, it emphasizes local governance by allowing local jurisdictions to establish more stringent septic regulations than those mandated by state law, thus enhancing local control in land management and environmental protection efforts.
Conclusion
The effective date of HB1113, set for 60 days after its passage, indicates a swift move towards addressing septic system management within the state. The bill’s provisions strive not only to enhance environmental accountability but also to preserve local governance in the face of overarching state regulations, fostering a balanced approach to ecological concern and property rights.
Contention
Despite its environmental intentions, the bill has faced some contention among stakeholders. Proponents argue that the modifications to septic system evaluations are necessary for preserving water quality and public health, pointing out the necessity of rigorous inspections for properties near water bodies. However, some opponents express concerns regarding the additional financial burden this may impose on property buyers and the feasibility of complying with the proposed evaluations. Moreover, there are apprehensions that while the bill grants local governments the power to enforce stricter standards, it may also complicate the transfer process of waterfront properties, thereby slowing down real estate transactions.
Relative to a report by the department of energy on the effectiveness of the system benefits charge and relative to surface water setbacks for landfills and relative to water quality.
Relative to restrictions on acquisition of ownership, controlling, and occupancy interests in real property by certain foreign principals on or around certain military installations, and criminal penalties and civil forfeiture procedures for illegal acquisition.
Relative to establishing a council to study the impacts of electric vehicles, e-mobility devices, and the associated lithium-ion batteries on first responder response, the environment, building and fire codes, life safety, and property protection.
Relative to training and procedures for zoning and planning boards and relative to financial investments and incentives for affordable housing development.