Prohibiting termination of a tenancy based on a tenant's failure to pay rent that was increased by certain price fixing programs.
If enacted, HB 1368 would significantly alter the landscape of landlord-tenant laws in New Hampshire. The legislation defines 'vertical price fixing' and stipulates that if an eviction is based on increased rent stemming from such practices, a presumption of unlawfulness will be established, leading to dismissal of the eviction action. Landlords would be required to disclose their pricing software records to rebut this presumption, increasing transparency in the eviction process. This move aims to enhance tenant protections and provide a more stable housing environment, particularly for those on fixed incomes or experiencing financial difficulties.
House Bill 1368 aims to protect tenants from eviction based on rent increases that are a result of 'vertical price fixing' practices by landlords. Specifically, the bill prohibits landlords from terminating a tenancy solely because a tenant fails to pay rent that has been increased through certain price fixing agreements. The bill seeks to address concerns surrounding unfair rent increases that could be influenced by collusion among landlords or automated pricing software, ensuring that tenants are not unjustly evicted for situations beyond their control.
The sentiment surrounding HB 1368 appears to be largely supportive among tenant advocacy groups, who view it as a critical step towards ensuring housing stability and fairness in rental practices. However, landlords and property management companies may express concern over the implications of the bill, arguing that it could hinder their ability to manage rental prices effectively. The discussion reflects a broader tension between protecting tenant rights and allowing landlords to maintain viable business operations.
Notably, some points of contention may arise regarding the definitions and parameters of 'vertical price fixing' as outlined in the bill. Landlords might challenge the characterization of rent increases driven by algorithmic pricing tools as inherently unjust, and they may argue about the practical difficulties of complying with the bill's disclosure requirements. Furthermore, the bill clearly states that it does not prevent eviction for nonpayment of rent on grounds unrelated to vertical price fixing, which could lead to further debates on what constitutes acceptable grounds for eviction under the existing laws.