Relative to the definition of potentially hazardous food.
The bill's passage signifies a substantial shift in state food safety regulations, particularly for small food producers operating from their homes. With the removal of processed acidified foods from the licensure requirement, it enables these producers to create such items without the need for commercial kitchen facilities. This change could encourage local entrepreneurship and potentially increase the availability of unique homestead food products in the market. However, the estimated fiscal impact is notable, with forecasts predicting a decrease in state revenues of approximately $10,000 annually due to the reduced licensing fees associated with these food products.
House Bill 1565-FN focuses on redefining certain food safety standards within New Hampshire. Specifically, it proposes to remove processed acidified foods from the existing definition of 'potentially hazardous food.' This definition pertains to food items that require temperature control to ensure safety, as they could foster the growth of harmful microorganisms. By amending this definition, the bill aims to relax regulations surrounding these types of food, allowing for greater flexibility in their production and sale.
Opposition to this bill primarily stems from concerns regarding food safety and public health. Critics argue that loosening the licensure requirements could lead to an increased risk of foodborne illnesses associated with homestead-produced foods. The Department of Health and Human Services has raised concerns about the potential expenses related to investigating such illnesses, which could offset the expected decrease in revenue from reduced licensing. This concern highlights the tension between supporting local food producers and ensuring consumer health and safety.