New Hampshire Senate Bill SB370

New Hampshire 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/12/23
• Refer: 12/12/23
• Refer: 2/1/24

Caption

Relative to annual training days for retired law enforcement officers.

Impact

The impact of SB370 on state law includes amendments to existing statutes concerning the training requirements for retired law enforcement personnel. By mandating annual training days, this legislation seeks to unify and enhance training protocols, which may lead to improvements in the competency of retired officers. Since these individuals often serve as informal community safety nets, the legislation is expected to bolster public confidence in the ability of retired law enforcement officers to respond to emergencies effectively.

Summary

Senate Bill 370 aims to establish a program within the state's Department of Safety to provide annual training days for retired law enforcement officers. The primary purpose of this program is to ensure that these individuals are firearms certified under the federal Law Enforcement Safety Act (LEOSA), specifically allowing them to carry concealed firearms across state lines. The bill seeks to enhance public safety by ensuring that retired officers possess the necessary skills and certification to carry firearms safely and responsibly.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB370 appears supportive among lawmakers and public safety advocates. Many argue that providing structured training opportunities is essential for retired law enforcement officers to stay current with safety standards and practices, thus improving community engagement and security. Few dissenting opinions caution about the potential implications of retired officers carrying firearms, raising concerns about how these regulations integrate with existing laws on public safety and firearm management.

Contention

Notable points of contention may revolve around the cost and resource allocation for implementing this annual training program. Critics might argue that state resources should be prioritized differently, or they may express concerns about the efficacy and need for such training programs, questioning whether it addresses the most pressing public safety needs. Additionally, there may be discussions around the necessity of such a program for officers who might not be actively engaging in law enforcement duties.