New Hampshire House Bill HB777

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/25
• Refer: 1/23/25
• Report Pass: 2/12/25
• Engrossed: 3/12/25
• Refer: 3/12/25
• Report Pass: 4/9/25
• Enrolled: 5/13/25
• Chaptered: 5/30/25
• Passed: 5/30/25

Caption

Codifying the law enforcement accreditation commission.

Impact

The passage of this bill would formally integrate the law enforcement accreditation commission into state law, granting it the authority to publish accreditation standards, conduct assessments, and monitor compliance among law enforcement agencies. This construct aims to ensure that police departments adhere to recognized standards of practice, potentially improving overall public safety and community relations. Additionally, the commission would have the power to grant, suspend, and revoke agency accreditation, further reinforcing accountability among law enforcement entities.

Summary

House Bill 777 aims to codify the New Hampshire Law Enforcement Accreditation Commission, which has previously operated under an executive order. This bill is presented as a collaborative initiative involving the police standards and training council, the law enforcement accreditation commission, and the office of the attorney general. By establishing this commission, the bill seeks to improve law enforcement services while enhancing accountability and trust within local communities through a voluntary accreditation program based on nationally accepted standards.

Contention

Some points of contention may arise around the potential implications of creating such a commission. Proponents argue that this measure will establish clearer accountability for police departments and promote adherence to high standards of service delivery. However, concerns may be raised regarding the state’s centralization of authority over local law enforcement standards and the fear that this could undermine local autonomy in addressing specific community needs. Additionally, discussions around funding for the commission and its operational rules may cause debate among legislators, particularly regarding the establishment of administrative fees and how donations or grants from external sources will be handled.