New Hampshire House Bill HCR1

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/23/24
• Refer: 12/23/24
• Report Pass: 2/11/25
• Report DNP: 2/11/25

Caption

Calling for policymakers locally and nationally to fully consider all relevant information and factors pertaining to climate change before pursuing courses of action that could adversely affect any economy or environment.

Impact

The resolution calls for a balanced approach to climate policy development, reflecting a spectrum of opinions regarding the human impact on climate change. By emphasizing the importance of thorough and careful consideration of data, HCR1 aims to contribute to a more informed legislative process. This could potentially lead to laws and policies that are more aligned with the diverse perspectives in the climate discourse, mitigating the risk of economically detrimental actions based on incomplete information.

Summary

HCR1 is a resolution aimed at urging local and national policymakers to thoroughly consider all relevant information and factors related to climate change before making decisions that might negatively affect the economy or the environment. The resolution acknowledges the occurrence of climate change throughout history and emphasizes the need for policy decisions to be rooted in comprehensive research. It points out concerns over the suppression of certain climate perspectives which may hinder the formation of robust climate policies.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR1 seems to reflect a degree of skepticism towards the prevailing climate narratives. Proponents of the resolution may view it as an essential corrective measure to ensure that diverse opinions and data are integrated into climate-related policymaking. However, it also hints at significant contention, as critics could see it as a way to delay or dilute urgent climate action, citing the need for comprehensive consideration as a potential barrier to swift legislative measures.

Contention

A notable point of contention resides in the resolution's standpoint against what it describes as 'climate alarmism' and the documented suppression of alternative viewpoints. This perspective could spark debates between different factions regarding the urgency of climate action versus the need for caution in policy formulation. The resolution could lead to tensions over the interpretation of climate data and the legitimacy of various research efforts, as well as how these should influence future climate laws.