New Hampshire House Bill HB1736

New Hampshire 2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/17/25
• Refer: 12/17/25
• Report DNP: 2/25/26

Caption

repealing the authority of the public utilities commission to approve alternative forms of regulation for utilities.

Impact

The proposed repeal would have significant implications for how utilities are regulated in the state. If passed, HB1736 would effectively disallow any non-traditional regulatory methods that could potentially provide more flexibility and innovation in utility management. Stakeholders in the energy sector have raised concerns that reverting to more rigid regulatory practices could hinder the adoption of new technologies and practices that align with contemporary energy demands and sustainability goals.

Summary

House Bill 1736 aims to repeal the authority of the public utilities commission to approve alternative forms of regulation for investor-owned electric and gas utilities. By eliminating this authority, the bill intends to revert back to traditional regulation methods, specifically the cost-of-service and rate base approaches. This change is positioned as a response to concerns about the efficacy and accountability of alternative regulatory frameworks that have been implemented in recent years.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB1736 appears to be mixed. Proponents argue that returning to traditional forms of regulation will enhance transparency and consumer protection, offering a more straightforward approach to utility management. Conversely, opponents warn that this shift may stifle advancements in utility regulations that could benefit consumers and the environment by limiting the commission's ability to experiment with alternative regulatory forms that may be more beneficial under certain conditions.

Contention

Significant contention exists around the perceived effectiveness of traditional versus alternative regulatory approaches. Supporters of the bill assert that traditional methods provide more stability and predictability for consumers, while critics contend that alternative approaches are crucial for adapting to evolving energy landscapes. The bill exemplifies a larger debate about the regulatory framework's role in balancing consumer protection, utility profitability, and innovation in energy services.