New Jersey 2022 2022-2023 Regular Session

New Jersey Assembly Bill A1439 Introduced / Fiscal Note

                       
Office of Legislative Services 
State House Annex 
P.O. Box 068 
Trenton, New Jersey  08625 
 	Legislative Budget and Finance Office 
Phone (609) 847-3105 
Fax (609) 777-2442 
www.njleg.state.nj.us 
  
 
LEGISLATIVE FISCAL ESTIMATE 
[First Reprint] 
ASSEMBLY, No. 1439 
STATE OF NEW JERSEY 
220th LEGISLATURE 
 
DATED: FEBRUARY 27, 2023 
 
 
SUMMARY 
 
Synopsis: Requires each solid waste management district to develop strategy in 
solid waste management plan to reduce food waste. 
Type of Impact: Annual expenditure increases by local government units, annual State 
expenditure increases. 
Agencies Affected: Department of Environmental Protection, municipalities, counties, 
New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority. 
 
Office of Legislative Services Estimate 
Fiscal Impact 	Year 1  Year 2 & Thereafter  
State Expenditure Increase At least $55,000 Indeterminate 
Local Expenditure Increase At least $1.16 million Indeterminate 
 
 
 The Office of Legislative Services (OLS) determines that this bill would result in a one-time 
expenditure increase by counties and the New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority 
(NJSEA) – which administers the Hackensack Meadowlands solid waste management district 
– to amend their solid waste management plans.  The OLS understands that the administrative 
costs for this process are approximately $5,000 per plan. 
 
 The OLS also determines that implementing a public awareness campaign would be the most 
cost-effective way for districts to attempt to achieve a 50 percent reduction in food waste 
collected by solid waste management districts.  Several counties informed the OLS that they 
have spent around $50,000 per year on similar campaigns in the past.  Assuming that each 
county and the NJSEA spend $55,000 to amend their plans and implement a one-year public 
awareness campaign, this yields a total one-time local cost of $1.16 million and a one-time 
State cost of $55,000. Multi-year public awareness campaigns would result in recurring costs 
for these entities, while the implementation of other food-waste reduction strategies could 
result in higher first year costs as well as recurring expenditures. 
 
 The bill would also result in a one-time marginal expenditure increase by the Department of 
Environmental Protection (DEP) to review and approve amended solid waste management  FE to A1439 [1R]  
2 
 
plans and to develop the webpage required by the bill.  Current staff using existing resources 
could likely perform these tasks.   
BILL DESCRIPTION 
 
 This bill would require each solid waste management district in the State (i.e., each county and 
the Hackensack Meadowlands solid waste management district) to develop, as part of its district 
solid waste management plan, a strategy to reduce food waste in the district. 
 Specifically, this bill would require each solid waste management district to develop and 
implement a strategy for reducing, by the year 2030, the amount of food waste generated annually 
in the district by at least 50 percent of the amount that is generated in the year this bill is enacted 
into law. The strategy would be adopted as an amendment to each district’s solid waste 
management plan and subject to the approval of the DEP.  
 The bill would require the DEP to develop, and publish on its website, a list of measures solid 
waste management districts can take in order to achieve the food waste reduction requirement 
established in the bill. These measures would include actions to prevent food waste and increase 
the donation of surplus edible food, the source separation and recycling of food waste, the 
composting and anaerobic digestion of food waste and other food waste diversion methods that 
also reduce methane emissions, and public awareness campaigns. 
 
 
FISCAL ANALYSIS 
 
EXECUTIVE BRANCH 
 
 None received. 
 
OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE SERVICES 
 
 The OLS determines that this bill would result in a one-time expenditure increase by counties 
and the NJSEA to amend their solid waste management plans.  The OLS understands that the 
administrative costs for this process for each solid waste management district are approximately 
$5,000. 
 The OLS also determines that implementing a public awareness campaign would be the most 
cost-effective way for districts to attempt to achieve a 50 percent reduction in food waste collected 
by solid waste management districts.  Several counties informed the OLS that they have spent 
around $50,000 per year on similar campaigns in the past.  Thus, assuming that each county and 
the NJSEA spend $55,000 to implement the bill, this yields a total local cost of $1.16 million and 
a State cost of $55,000 in the first year.  Multi-year public awareness campaigns would result in 
recurring expenditures to counties and the NJSEA.  The highest-cost scenario would likely be that 
municipalities are required to create new systems for the collection and recycling of food waste – 
for example, a separate curbside collection system to pick up food waste and deliver it to a food 
waste recycling or composting center.  This scenario may cost the average municipality in the State 
millions of dollars to implement, representing a potential total local expenditure increase in the 
hundreds of millions of dollars.  In addition, this expenditure increase would be recurring.  On the 
other hand, local expenditures on food waste-reduction programs that result in a lower volume of 
collected food waste could result in an indeterminate cost savings over time from lower tipping 
fees paid to landfills and incinerators.  FE to A1439 [1R]  
3 
 
 The bill would also result in a one-time marginal expenditure increase by the DEP to review 
and approve amended solid waste management plans and to develop the webpage required by the 
bill.  Current staff using existing resources could likely perform these tasks.   
Section: Environment, Agriculture, Energy, and Natural Resources 
Analyst: Neha Patel 
Senior Research Analyst 
Approved: Thomas Koenig 
Legislative Budget and Finance Officer 
 
 
This legislative fiscal estimate has been produced by the Office of Legislative Services due to the 
failure of the Executive Branch to respond to our request for a fiscal note. 
 
This fiscal estimate has been prepared pursuant to P.L.1980, c.67 (C.52:13B-6 et seq.).