New Jersey Assembly Bill A1449

New Jersey 2022-2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/11/22
• Refer: 1/11/22

Caption

Requires certain standards for professional and occupational boards considering applicants with criminal history records.

Impact

If enacted, the bill will strengthen the rights of individuals with criminal records, allowing them a fair chance at licensure by requiring boards to provide clear reasoning and an opportunity for applicants to contest decisions that disqualify them due to past convictions. The legislation mandates that boards take into account various factors—including the nature of the crime, the time elapsed since the event, the applicant’s rehabilitation, and the specific relation of the crime to the duties of the profession. This approach reflects a more rehabilitative perspective rather than a punitive one.

Summary

Assembly Bill A1449 proposes new standards for professional and occupational boards in New Jersey when evaluating individuals with criminal histories for licensure, certification, or registration. The bill insists that boards must consider whether a past conviction directly relates to the occupation for which the individual is being assessed. Current legal standards allow boards to deny applications based on convictions of moral turpitude or related offenses, but A1449 aims to tighten these criteria by focusing on direct relevance to the profession instead of general disqualification based on moral character.

Contention

Debate surrounding the bill may center on concerns regarding public safety and the integrity of professional standards. Opponents might argue that loosening restrictions on licensure for individuals with criminal records could jeopardize the quality of services provided to the public, particularly in sensitive work areas. Proponents, however, may contend that rehabilitation efforts should be recognized and that individuals who have demonstrated significant personal growth should not be barred from contributing to society. This aspect of the bill highlights the tension between maintaining professional standards and fostering inclusivity for those seeking a second chance.