New Jersey Assembly Bill A1624

New Jersey 2022-2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/11/22
• Refer: 1/11/22

Caption

Extends deadline for midpoint status report of municipal fair share affordable housing obligation compliance.

Impact

The extension proposed by A1624 seeks to alleviate the pressures municipalities face in adhering to the tight timelines imposed on them. It assures that these local entities are not unduly penalized for delays that have arisen due to unforeseen circumstances such as the pandemic. Allowing more time to present their status regarding compliance with housing elements could help maintain the flow of affordable housing development and ensure that the municipalities can effectively plan and implement their housing strategies. This additional timeframe is expected to contribute positively towards achieving compliance with affordable housing obligations, especially in light of settlement agreements with housing advocates such as the Fair Share Housing Center.

Summary

A1624 is a legislative bill introduced in the New Jersey Assembly aimed at extending the deadline for municipalities to comply with the midpoint status report of their affordable housing obligations. Specifically, it allows municipalities an additional year to submit their midpoint realistic opportunity reviews, which are crucial for evaluating the implementation of their approved housing elements and fair share plans according to the 'Fair Housing Act', P.L.1985, c.222. This extension is particularly significant due to the operational challenges faced by local governments amid the COVID-19 pandemic, which has hindered their ability to complete necessary reviews and reports on time.

Contention

While the bill appears to be a reasonable response to the difficulties faced by municipalities, it may spark discussions around the balance between the need for timely reviews and the importance of compliance with fair housing laws. Critics may argue that continuously extending deadlines could lead to complacency in meeting affordable housing obligations and potentially stall progress in addressing housing shortages. Proponents, however, emphasize the necessity of flexibility during extraordinary times, urging that the delay could ultimately lead to better long-term planning and implementation of housing initiatives across New Jersey.