New Jersey Assembly Bill A1644

New Jersey 2022-2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/11/22
• Refer: 1/11/22

Caption

Makes General Fund supplemental appropriation of $350,000 to DMVA for Council on Armed Forces and Veterans' Affairs for preservation of military installations in case of base realignment and closure.

Impact

The implementation of A1644 has several implications for state law and local military operations. Appropriating funds for the preservation of military installations highlights the state's commitment to its military and veteran communities. It aims to prevent the loss or degradation of military bases that could result from BRAC decisions. This bill could help mitigate adverse effects on local economies that rely on military installations for jobs and economic stability. The funding will support necessary upgrades or maintaining existing military properties, fostering a resilience against potential federal cutbacks.

Summary

A1644 is a legislative proposal from the State of New Jersey aimed at providing financial support to the Department of Military and Veterans' Affairs (DMVA) for preserving military installations. The bill proposes a supplemental appropriation of $350,000 from the General Fund specifically for the Council on Armed Forces and Veterans' Affairs. The main focus of this appropriation is to prepare for potential federal actions concerning base realignment and closure (BRAC), which can affect military facilities across the state. By securing these funds, the state intends to ensure that its military infrastructure remains viable and competitive amidst the possibility of federal realignment decisions.

Contention

While the bill serves a crucial function in supporting military infrastructure, it may also elicit discussions regarding budget priorities. Some stakeholders might question whether the allocation of $350,000 to military preservation aligns with other pressing state needs. Additionally, discussions around military funding often prompt broader debates about national defense versus state budget allocations for education, healthcare, and social services. Therefore, while the bill's intention is well-placed in terms of military support, its funding source and impacts will need thorough consideration in legislative discussions.