New Jersey Assembly Bill A4519

New Jersey 2022-2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/22/22
• Refer: 9/22/22
• Refer: 11/14/22
• Report Pass: 12/5/22

Caption

Prohibits motor vehicle manufacturer or dealer from requiring subscription for certain motor vehicle features and from charging certain fees.

Impact

If enacted, A4519 will enhance consumer protection in the automotive marketplace by preventing manufacturers and dealers from imposing new charges for functionalities that are already present in vehicles. This aligns with broader consumer rights initiatives, as the bill addresses concerns over transparency and fairness in the automotive sales process. It may significantly alter the strategies utilized by vehicle manufacturers in marketing these features, potentially leading to a reassessment of how these functions are offered and priced to consumers.

Summary

Assembly Bill 4519 aims to regulate the practices of motor vehicle manufacturers and dealers, specifically concerning subscription services and post-purchase fees for certain vehicle features. The bill proposes to prohibit dealers and manufacturers from requiring subscriptions or imposing additional fees for features that are already installed in motor vehicles at the point of sale. This legislation responds to growing consumer frustrations regarding the trend of charging ongoing fees for features that do not incur significant additional costs to the provider after the initial purchase.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding A4519 appears to be predominantly positive among consumer advocacy groups and a segment of the public who view the bill as a necessary step in rectifying perceived injustices in auto sales practices. However, some industry representatives may express concerns regarding the implications for business models that rely on subscription services for ongoing revenue. The debate likely centers on balancing consumer protection with the interests of the automotive industry and innovation in vehicle technology.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise around the interpretation of what constitutes an acceptable use of subscription services in the automotive industry. Critics of the bill may argue that prohibiting subscription services for certain features could stifle innovation and leave manufacturers limited in their ability to provide value-added services. Additionally, the delineation between features that require continuous fees versus those that can be offered as part of the initial sale may lead to legal ambiguities that could challenge enforcement of the bill's provisions.