New Jersey Senate Bill S2289

New Jersey 2022-2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/14/22
• Refer: 3/14/22

Caption

Requires automatic machine recount for certain elections that result in tie vote and establishes process to resolve subsequent tie votes.

Impact

The implementation of S2289 would amend Chapter 28 of Title 19 of the Revised Statutes and modify the way ties are resolved in elections. Currently, candidates and voters are able to contest election results through the courts, but this bill seeks to standardize and expedite the recount process. The automatic nature of these recounts could promote voter confidence in the electoral process by ensuring that every vote is accurately counted in the event of a tie. Additionally, by placing a timeline on recount procedures, the bill aims to enhance the efficiency of elections and reduce uncertainty following contested results.

Summary

Senate Bill S2289 introduces significant changes to the process for handling tied elections in New Jersey. The bill mandates an automatic machine recount for elections that result in a tie between candidates for elective office, excluding primary and school elections. This recount is to be conducted within 48 hours of the initial tie results. If the machine recount does not resolve the tie, a hand recount will follow, also to be conducted within 48 hours. Should a tie still persist after the hand recount, a special election is to be scheduled within 60 days to determine the winner among the tied candidates.

Contention

Despite its intent to streamline electoral procedures, the bill could face contention from those who believe it could complicate the election process, particularly surrounding the logistics of conducting recounts and the financial implications for the state. The requirement for a special election may also be a point of debate, as it could result in additional costs and disrupt the electoral timetable. Critics may argue that the automatic nature of these recounts does not account for potential discrepancies in vote counting technologies, and thus, further scrutiny may be needed to ensure transparency and reliability.