Establishes "New Jersey No Patient Left Alone Act"; requires certain facilities to establish policies guaranteeing visitation rights for facility residents.
The implementation of S2520 will significantly change the landscape of patient visitation rights in New Jersey. Under the new law, residents will be allowed at least two hours of in-person visitation daily, with terminally ill patients granted unlimited visitation. This approach aims to enhance the quality of life for residents, allowing them to maintain connections with their loved ones, which is particularly crucial during end-of-life care. By ensuring consistent visitation rights, the bill responds to past restrictions faced by patients and implements safeguards against possible future emergencies that could limit such rights.
Senate Bill S2520, known as the 'New Jersey No Patient Left Alone Act', is designed to ensure that patients in specific care facilities maintain their right to in-person visitation. The bill mandates that each facility, including long-term care facilities, hospices, and community residences, establish clear visitation policies and procedures within 30 days of the bill's enactment. These policies are required to include infection control measures, rules governing the length and number of visits, and must not be more stringent than those that apply to staff members. Additionally, the bill explicitly prohibits facilities from demanding visitor vaccination status as a prerequisite for visitation.
While widely seen as a positive step for patient rights, S2520 may raise concerns among healthcare administrators regarding the feasibility of enforcing these visitation rules amidst varying health emergencies. Critics argue that the requirements could impose burdens on facilities during crises, such as pandemics, where the need for stringent infection controls contrasts with the desire for open visitation rights. The bill attempts to balance these perspectives by mandating that visitation rules must be reasonable and not inhibit essential infection control protocols, yet the potential for conflict in implementation remains a notable point of discussion.