New Jersey Senate Bill S664

New Jersey 2022-2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/11/22
• Refer: 1/11/22

Caption

Prohibits public employers from requiring and funding training courses that pass blame or judgment on basis of race, ethnicity, or sex.

Impact

If enacted, S664 would introduce significant changes to state laws regarding workplace training and employee education in New Jersey. The bill's prohibition of training that places blame based on race, ethnicity, or sex reflects a broader discussion on how such topics are approached in public employer settings. The legislation aims to prevent divisions and promote a more unified work environment, however critics may argue that it undermines the importance of diversity training and awareness related to systemic discrimination. Furthermore, the requirement for the State Treasurer to report annually on compliance levels indicates a measure of oversight intended to ensure adherence to the prescribed guidelines.

Summary

Senate Bill 664, introduced in the New Jersey legislature, aims to address the training requirements imposed on public employees. Specifically, the bill prohibits public employers from requiring employees to participate in training programs that promote a narrative of blame or judgment based on an individual's race, ethnicity, or sex. It further asserts that public employers cannot allocate funds to develop such training programs. However, the bill does allow for training on sexual harassment, ensuring that programs focused on this specific issue remain permissible under the law.

Contention

There are notable points of contention surrounding S664, particularly in the context of the ongoing national dialogue regarding race and systemic racism in training programs. Proponents advocate for the bill as a necessary measure to protect employees from feelings of guilt or discomfort arising from training that critiques their race or background. Opponents, on the other hand, may contend that the bill limits essential discussions and learning opportunities about racial and social inequities, potentially stalling progress toward more inclusive work environments. The balance between acknowledging historical disparities and fostering a sense of unity in public service remains a crucial debate in the passage of this bill.