New Jersey Assembly Bill A1661

New Jersey 2024-2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/24
• Refer: 1/9/24

Caption

Establishes timelines for review and approval by Commissioner of Education of annual certified audits submitted by approved private schools for students with disabilities.

Impact

This bill aims to significantly streamline the audit review process, reducing the financial and operational uncertainties faced by APSSDs and sending school districts. The current protracted timelines for audit approval have disrupted budgeting and funding processes, as school districts often face delays in finalizing tuition rates for students with disabilities. By mandating a more efficient review period, A1661 seeks to enhance accountability in the educational service provision for vulnerable students with disabilities, ultimately improving their educational outcomes.

Summary

A1661 establishes clear timelines for the Commissioner of Education's review and approval of annual certified audits from approved private schools for students with disabilities (APSSDs). The legislation is designed to address significant delays that have historically plagued the audit process, often extending to 20 years or more. Under the new provisions, the Commissioner must complete reviews of audits submitted for any school year ending after the bill's effective date within seven years. For audits submitted for years prior, the time frame is set to seven years post-submission or two years following the bill's effective date, whichever is later.

Contention

While supporters argue that the bill will bring fairness and clarity to the audit process, critics may raise concerns about the adequacy of the timelines imposed. There could be apprehension regarding whether the established periods allow sufficient time for thorough reviews to ensure compliance and accountability. The balance between expediting the process and maintaining rigorous oversight will be a focal point of discussion as the bill moves through the legislative process. The concerns about potential lingering discrepancies in audits from prior years may also be a topic of contention as stakeholders evaluate the proposed changes.