New Jersey Assembly Bill A1923

New Jersey 2024-2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/24
• Refer: 1/9/24

Caption

Requires owner or operator of certain trains to have discharge response, cleanup, and contingency plans to transport certain hazardous materials by rail; requires DEP to request bridge inspection reports from US DOT.

Impact

If enacted, A1923 will significantly influence state laws regarding freight rail operations, specifically in emergency preparedness. It demands that train operators not only develop and maintain response plans but also provide training to local emergency services. The bill emphasizes the need to deploy trained personnel and necessary equipment promptly in case hazardous materials are discharged, aiming to minimize the environmental impact. Furthermore, the DEP will have the authority to review these plans and impose penalties for violations, thus creating an accountability structure for rail operators regarding hazardous material handling.

Summary

Assembly Bill A1923 is a legislative measure aimed at enhancing the safety protocols associated with the transportation of hazardous materials via rail in New Jersey. The bill mandates that owners or operators of high hazard trains must submit a comprehensive discharge response, cleanup, and contingency plan to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) within six months of the bill's effective date. This plan requires updating every five years and includes detailed emergency response measures, identification of cleanup equipment, and the qualifications of trained personnel. The intent is to prepare for potential hazardous substance discharges effectively and swiftly, thereby protecting public safety and the environment.

Contention

Notable points of contention might arise from the implications of imposing rigorous safety measures on rail operators, which could be seen as burdensome by some in the rail industry. The specifics of the training and equipment standards could generate discussions on feasibility and costs. Additionally, operators of Class III carriers, which are exempt from these requirements, might advocate for maintaining their operations without similar regulatory pressures. This bill will likely prompt debates about balancing safety and regulatory burdens against economic considerations in the transport sector.