New Jersey Assembly Bill A2364

New Jersey 2024-2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/24
• Refer: 1/9/24
• Refer: 3/4/24
• Refer: 5/20/24

Caption

Establishes Deepfake Technology Unit in DLPS; appropriates $2 million.

Impact

If enacted, A2364 would significantly impact the existing framework of state law concerning the investigation of audio and visual media. The unit will provide technical assistance to law enforcement, offer training on the detection of deepfakes, and develop evidence for prosecutorial use. This aligns with evolving legal frameworks aimed at addressing contemporary challenges in crime and misinformation, providing law enforcement with necessary resources to tackle deepfake-related offenses effectively.

Summary

Assembly Bill A2364 proposes the establishment of a Deepfake Technology Unit within the New Jersey Division of Law and Public Safety. The primary objective of this unit is to enhance state capabilities in detecting and investigating deceptive audio and visual media—commonly referred to as 'deepfakes.' The bill allocates $2 million from the General Fund to support the unit's formation and operational activities. This initiative reflects the growing concern related to the misuse of advanced technology in creating misleading media that can affect public trust and safety.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears generally supportive, especially among lawmakers concerned with the implications of unregulated deepfake technology. Supporters emphasize the importance of protecting citizens and maintaining the integrity of information in a digital age. However, some may express concerns regarding the funding allocation and the potential for overreach in surveillance or censorship as law enforcement gains enhanced powers to investigate media authenticity.

Contention

Notable points of contention could arise around the definition of 'deceptive audio or visual media' and the autonomy of the newly established unit. As the bill empowers the Attorney General to set guidelines, questions may emerge regarding the scope of authority and the balance between combating fraud and safeguarding freedom of expression. This tension could lead to discussions about necessary checks and balances in the application of technologies aimed at policing content.