New Jersey 2024 2024-2025 Regular Session

New Jersey Assembly Bill A3772 Comm Sub / Analysis

                     
ASSEMBLY STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT 
COMMITTEE 
 
STATEMENT TO  
 
ASSEMBLY, No. 3772  
 
STATE OF NEW JERSEY 
 
DATED:  JUNE 24, 2024 
 
 The Assembly State and Local Government Committee reports 
favorably Assembly Bill No. 3772. 
 This bill would revise the “tax sale law,” R.S.54:5-1 et seq., and 
the In Rem Tax Foreclosure Act (1948), P.L.1948, c.96 (C.54:5-
104.29 et seq.), to bring those laws into compliance with the recent 
United States Supreme Court decision in Tyler v. Hennepin County, 
Minnesota, et al., 143 S. Ct. 1369 (2023) concerning the ability of a 
property owner, whose right to redeem a tax lien on their property 
has been foreclosed by the holder of a tax sale certificate, to receive 
any of the owner’s equity remaining in the property after the tax 
lien foreclosure. 
 Under current State law, the holder of a tax sale certificate, after 
six months, in the case of a municipality that holds the tax sale 
certificate or in the case of the holder of a tax sale certificate on a 
property that is abandoned, or after two years, in the case of a third 
party lienholder, may file suit in Superior Court to foreclose the 
right of the property owner to redeem the tax lien. Upon the 
foreclosure, the lienholder will receive title to the property and all 
of the equity remaining in the property, leaving the former property 
owner with no funds from the foreclosure with which to purchase 
another property. 
 In the Tyler decision, the Supreme Court determined that 
Hennepin County could not keep the equity in the property beyond 
the amount it was owed for overdue property taxes and interest 
thereon. Under the Court’s ruling, that excess equity was 
considered as property that could not be taken from the former 
property owner consistent with the takings clause restrictions of the 
5th Amendment of the United States Constitution. 
 This bill would amend current law to permit a property owner to 
require a judicial sale as in the manner of the foreclosure of a 
mortgage of the property by the county sheriff in the same manner 
as mortgage foreclosures are subject to a judicial sale as in the 
manner of the foreclosure of a mortgage, or an Internet auction of 
the property through the office of the county sheriff.  The property 
owner would have to make a motion to the Superior Court for either  2 
 
a judicial sale as in the manner of the foreclosure of a mortgage or 
an Internet auction of the property by the office of the county 
sheriff within 45 days of receiving the complaint for foreclosure or, 
in the case of an in rem foreclosure, within 45 days of receiving the 
complaint for foreclosure or the publication of the notice of 
foreclosure as required by law, whichever date is later. The 
property owner would be advised of this information, in boldface 
type, with the service of the complaint for foreclosure. 
 This bill would not require a judicial sale as in the manner of the 
foreclosure of a mortgage or an Internet auction of the property 
through the office of the county sheriff if the property owner does 
not make a demand for one.  This would save the lien holder from 
incurring substantial costs associated with a judicial sale as in the 
manner of the foreclosure of a mortgage or Internet auction of the 
property through the office of the county sheriff. Many owners 
have no equity in their property to protect during a tax lien 
foreclosure. However, any property owner who wants a judicial 
sale as in the manner of the foreclosure of a mortgage or an Internet 
auction of the property through the office of the county sheriff will 
be able to obtain one by simply requesting one from the court.