New Jersey 2024 2024-2025 Regular Session

New Jersey Assembly Bill A4045 Comm Sub / Analysis

                    ASSEMBLY APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE 
 
STATEMENT TO  
 
[First Reprint] 
ASSEMBLY, No. 4045  
 
with committee amendments 
 
STATE OF NEW JERSEY 
 
DATED:  MAY 10, 2024 
 
 The Assembly Appropriations Committee reports favorably and 
with committee amendments Assembly Bill No. 4045 (1R). 
 As amended by the committee, this bill makes various changes to 
the law governing access to government records, commonly known 
as the open public records act, including the following: 
 modifies the conditions under which a records custodian has to 
respond to a request for records, allowing the custodian discretion 
to deny duplicative requests; 
 encourages and allocates funds to assist public agencies in 
moving documents online, making these records searchable via an 
online database, to the extent feasible; 
 creates a comprehensive definition of “personal identifying 
information” which, in many cases, is redacted by the records 
custodian; 
 establishes specific timelines for responses to records requests 
occurring under various circumstances, such as when a record may 
be unavailable or in storage, and adds additional specificity and 
clarity to the items and information which are exempt from public 
access; 
 transfers the responsibility for violations from the custodian to 
the public agency, and allows, in limited circumstances, for the 
courts to issue a protective order to shield the agency from 
harassment; 
 alters the composition of the Government Records Council, 
adding more public members, establishing staggered five year terms 
and annual salaries, and ensuring partisan balance;  
 adds labor organizations, contractor signatories, and nonprofit 
organizations to the list of parties exempt from “commercial purpose”; 
 defines “labor organization”;  
 removes record request limitations and registration fees on data 
brokers; 
 removes the following from exemption from public record 
requests: notes, draft material, deliberative material, information  2 
 
related to negotiating positions, logs of telephone calls, logs of texts, 
logs of emails, and electronic or paper calendars for individuals; 
 specifies legal next of kin, legal representatives, attending 
physicians, when permitted by a court, and courts may have access to 
visual autopsy records; 
 specifies that releasing security footage is permitted as long as it 
does not compromise the integrity of the security system; 
 prohibits indecent or graphic images of a person’s intimate parts 
from release by a record request; 
 requires the custodian to provide a requestor with an itemized list 
of charges and permit the requestor to challenge the charges;  
 determines charges are reasonable and places burden of proof upon 
requestor to determine that charges are not reasonable; 
 allows public agency to charge certain fees or not complete a 
request if the medium of the record requested is unavailable; 
 specifies that a request submitted anonymously will not be 
considered incomplete; 
 requires the Government Records Council to create a uniform 
record request form that will be adopted by all public agencies; 
 allows a commercial requestor to pay a special service fee to 
receive a record in seven business days instead of 14 business days; 
 specifies that the court or Government Records Council may award 
a reasonable attorney’s fee to any requestor who prevails in any 
proceeding, but determines that a requestor will always receive a 
reasonable attorney’s fee if the public agency has been determined to 
have denied the record unreasonably, acted in bad faith, or knowingly 
and willfully violated the open public records act; 
 requires the Superior Court and the Administrative Office of the 
Courts to report certain data on actions brought before the court 
regarding record requests; 
 removes the Police Record Access Improvement Task Force; and  
 appropriates an additional $2,000,000 for the Government Records 
Council to effectuate the purposes of the bill. 
 Nothing in this bill is intended to modify Daniel’s Law restrictions 
on the disclosure or re-disclosure of covered person’s home address, 
including street address or other home address identifiers, or 
unpublished home phone number information following a request for 
removal. 
 As amended and reported by the committee, Assembly Bill No. 
4045 (1R) is identical to Senate Bill No. 2930 (2R). 
 
COMMITTEE AMENDMENTS : 
 The committee amended the bill to: 
 add labor organizations, contractor signatories, and nonprofit 
organizations to the list of parties exempt from “commercial purpose”; 
 define “labor organization;”   3 
 
 remove record request limitations and registration fees on data 
brokers; 
 remove the following from exemption from public record requests: 
notes, draft material, deliberative material, information related to 
negotiating positions, logs of telephone calls, logs of texts, logs of 
emails, and electronic or paper calendars for individuals; 
 specify legal next of kin, legal representatives, attending 
physicians, when permitted by a court, and courts may have access to 
visual autopsy records; 
 specify that releasing security footage is permitted as long as it 
does not compromise the integrity of the security system; 
 prohibit indecent or graphic images of a person’s intimate parts 
from release by a record request; 
 require the custodian to provide a requestor with an itemized list of 
charges and permit the requestor to challenge the charges;  
 determine charges are reasonable and places burden of proof upon 
requestor to determine that charges are not reasonable; 
 allow public agency to charge certain fees or not complete a 
request if the medium of the record requested is unavailable; 
 specify that a request submitted anonymously will not be 
considered incomplete; 
 require the Government Records Council to create a uniform 
record request form that will be adopted by all public agencies; 
 allow a commercial requestor to pay a special service fee to 
receive a record in seven business days instead of 14 business days; 
 specify that the court or Government Records Council may award 
a reasonable attorney’s fee to any requestor who prevails in any 
proceeding, but determines that a requestor will always receive a 
reasonable attorney’s fee if the public agency has been determined to 
have denied the record unreasonably, acted in bad faith, or knowingly 
and willfully violated the open public records act; 
 require the Superior Court and the Administrative Office of the 
Courts to report certain data on actions brought before the court 
regarding record requests; 
 remove Police Record Access Improvement Task Force; and  
 appropriate an additional $2,000,000 for the Government Records 
Council to effectuate the purposes of the bill. 
 Nothing in this bill is intended to modify Daniel’s Law restrictions 
on the disclosure or re-disclosure of covered person’s home address, 
including street address or other home address identifiers, or 
unpublished home phone number information following a request for 
removal. 
 
FISCAL IMPACT: 
 The Office of Legislative Services (OLS) concludes that this bill 
will result in an indeterminate net impact on the finances of State and 
local public agencies.  4 
 
        The OLS determines that the bill may result in a State cost 
increase of up to $10 million in the first year the bill is in effect.  If the 
full $10 million is not expended in the first year, the residual amount 
will be spent in subsequent fiscal years until the full $10 million is 
exhausted. 
        The bill appropriates $4 million for the Department of 
Community Affairs to provide grants to political subdivisions of the 
State to make government records available to the public 
electronically, including through shared services agreements. The 
State expenditure increase would lead to a concurrent revenue increase 
for counties, municipalities, and school districts that receive grants 
under the program. 
        The bill also appropriates $6 million to the Department of 
Community Affairs for the establishment and operations of the 
Government Records Council. 
        Beyond the appropriated amount, the OLS is unable to estimate 
the direction and magnitude of the bill’s net impact on State and local 
finances.  This is so because of the countervailing effects of the bill, 
some examples of which include: 
 1)  Annual expenditure and revenue decreases for public agencies 
from an overall reduction in the number of requests to which an 
agency must respond and the number of records which must be 
produced. 
 2)  Potential annual expenditure increases for public agencies to 
make any adjustments and modifications necessary to meet accelerated 
records request fulfillment and complaint adjudication timelines. 
 3)  Annual State expenditure increase for a new salary of $12,000 
for each of the eight public members of the Government Records 
Council, pursuant to the bill. 
 4)  Annual expenditure decrease for public agencies resulting from 
the bill’s provision that removes the mandatory awarding of attorney’s 
fees to a requestor who prevails in any complaint proceeding against a 
public agency.