New Jersey Assembly Bill A4168

New Jersey 2024-2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/8/24
• Refer: 4/8/24
• Report Pass: 10/21/24

Caption

Requires DCPP to consult with Division of Developmental Disabilities following finding of child abuse or neglect to create services plan for person with developmental disability under certain circumstances.

Impact

The implications of A4168 are significant as it amends existing laws under P.L.1974, c.119, which regulate therapeutic services in the context of child welfare. By ensuring that DCPP collaborates with DDD, the bill aims to provide more comprehensive support for individuals with disabilities in the judicial system. This change is expected to not only address the immediate therapeutic needs of individuals but also to promote a better understanding of their specific requirements within the child protection framework. Such provisions are crucial, as they reflect an evolving awareness and institutional commitment to cater to the unique challenges faced by persons with developmental disabilities.

Summary

Assembly Bill A4168, introduced in New Jersey, seeks to enhance the support provided to individuals with developmental disabilities who are involved in child abuse or neglect cases. Specifically, the bill mandates that the Division of Child Protection and Permanency (DCPP) consult with the Division of Developmental Disabilities (DDD) when a court determines that an individual who has abused or neglected a child requires therapeutic services. This consultation aims to create a tailored service plan that takes into account the person's developmental disability. The services may encompass various forms of support such as homemaker services, functional education, and professional therapy.

Contention

While many view this legislation as a progressive step toward inclusivity and effective child protection, there may also be points of contention among stakeholders. Concerns could arise regarding the resource implications for DCPP and DDD, especially in terms of staffing and the adequacy of services available. Some critics might also argue about the potential bureaucracy in the consultation process, which could delay timely intervention in cases of abuse or neglect. However, proponents would likely emphasize the importance of such consultations in ensuring appropriate care and services for vulnerable populations, thus advocating for a balanced approach to implementation.