New Jersey Assembly Bill A4291

New Jersey 2024-2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/6/24
• Refer: 5/6/24

Caption

Expands eligibility for gross income tax credit to family caregivers of certain armed service members with physical disabilities.

Impact

The proposed changes in A4291 are expected to enhance the financial support available to family caregivers in New Jersey, thereby recognizing the burdens these caregivers face while providing care to their relatives. By allowing a broader range of service-related disabilities to qualify for the tax credit, it not only expands the pool of eligible caregivers but may also alleviate some of the financial strains encountered by families caring for veterans. Furthermore, this adjustment could pave the way for increased state revenue contributions due to the empowerment and support of caregiving roles, leading to safer and more stable living conditions for affected families.

Summary

Assembly Bill A4291 seeks to expand the eligibility criteria for the gross income tax credit available to family caregivers of veterans with physical disabilities. Under existing legislation, known as the Wounded Warrior Caregivers Relief Act, specific criteria are outlined for a caregiver to qualify for the credit. These include the degree of relation to the armed service member and specific income thresholds. The new bill proposes to broaden these criteria to include armed service members with disabilities not limited to those occurring during or after wartime, thus potentially increasing the number of caregivers eligible for financial assistance.

Contention

While the bill primarily garners support for its intent to expand benefits to a deserving group, there are points of contention that may arise during legislative discussions. Critics may argue about the fiscal implications of increasing tax credits at a time when state budgets are under pressure. There are concerns regarding the long-term sustainability of such tax incentives and whether they might divert resources from other essential services. Additionally, there may be discussions about whether the criteria are yet inclusive enough, or if further amendments should be made to accommodate additional contingencies in veterans' healthcare needs.