New Jersey 2024 2024-2025 Regular Session

New Jersey Assembly Bill A4755 Introduced / Fiscal Note

                       
Office of Legislative Services 
State House Annex 
P.O. Box 068 
Trenton, New Jersey  08625 
 	Legislative Budget and Finance Office 
Phone (609) 847-3105 
Fax (609) 777-2442 
www.njleg.state.nj.us 
  
 
LEGISLATIVE FISCAL ESTIMATE 
[Second Reprint] 
ASSEMBLY, No. 4755 
STATE OF NEW JERSEY 
221st LEGISLATURE 
 
DATED: FEBRUARY 27, 2025 
 
 
SUMMARY 
 
Synopsis: Upgrades, and in some circumstances provides for extended terms of 
imprisonment for, certain retail theft crimes, addresses gift card fraud, 
and authorizes new Attorney General initiatives to address organized 
retail theft. 
Type of Impact: Annual State and local expenditure and revenue increases. 
Agencies Affected: The Judiciary; Department of Law and Public Safety; Department of 
Corrections; State Parole Board; Office of the Public Defender; 
Counties; Municipalities. 
 
 
Office of Legislative Services Estimate 
Annual Fiscal Impact  
State Expenditure Increase                             Indeterminate  
State Revenue Increase                             Indeterminate  
Local Expenditure Increase                             Indeterminate  
Local Revenue Increase                            Indeterminate 
 
 
 The Office of Legislative Services (OLS) concludes that establishing and upgrading certain 
crimes related to retail theft and sentencing certain defendants to extended prison terms may 
result in an indeterminate annual increase in State and local expenditures and revenues. The 
OLS lacks sufficient information to quantify the fiscal impact, as it is not possible to estimate 
the number of crimes likely to be committed under the provisions of this bill or how many 
persistent offenders will be sentenced to extended prison terms.   
 The OLS finds that the following State and local agencies may incur caseload and expenditure 
increases: a) the Department of Law and Public Safety may have to prosecute additional cases; 
b) county prosecutors may also have to prosecute additional cases; c) the Judiciary may have 
to adjudicate additional complaints and monitor additional probationers; d) the Office of the 
Public Defender may have to represent additional low income defendants; e) the Department 
of Corrections may have to house and care for additional offenders for routine and extended  FE to A4755 [2R] 
2 
 
prison sentences; and f) the State Parole Board may have to supervise the return to society of 
additional offenders.  In addition, the Department of Law and Public Safety may establish a 
special unit or task force to combat retail theft. 
 The OLS notes that the State may receive indeterminate revenues from regular and enhanced 
fines imposed on individuals convicted of these crimes; however, the State’s ability to collect 
fines has historically been limited. 
 The bill establishes the offense of fostering the sale of stolen property as a disorderly persons 
offense.  Annual local expenditures and revenues are likely to increase as disorderly persons 
offenses are adjudicated in municipal courts and defendants are sentenced to county jails.  
Generally, a presumption of non-incarceration applies to first time offenders in these cases. 
Annual municipal revenue would likely increase due to an increase in court filing fees and 
penalties from these disorderly persons cases. 
 
 
BILL DESCRIPTION 
 
 This bill makes various changes to State law related to retail theft.  The bill establishes and 
upgrades certain crimes related to retail theft, permits certain defendants to be sentenced to 
extended terms of imprisonment, and permits the establishment a retail theft unit in the Department 
of Law and Public Safety.  
 The bill establishes that it is aggravated assault to assault an employee of a store or other retail 
mercantile establishment. Aggravated assault of an employee of a retail mercantile establishment 
is a crime of the third degree if the victim suffers bodily injury; otherwise, it is a crime of the fourth 
degree.  A crime of the third degree is punishable by three to five years imprisonment, a fine of up 
to $15,000, or both.  A crime of the fourth degree is punishable by up to 18 months imprisonment, 
a fine of up to $10,000, or both. 
 The bill establishes a crime of the second degree if any portion of a tax, fee, penalty, or interest, 
required to be paid or turned over was accrued through conduct as a leader of an organized retail 
theft enterprise, otherwise it is a crime of the third degree.  Relatedly, the bill clarifies that a person 
is guilty of a crime of the second degree if the taxes the person failed to turn over to the Division 
of Taxation were collected or withheld as part of an organized retail theft enterprise. A crime of 
the second degree is punishable by five to 10 years imprisonment, a fine of up to $150,000, or 
both. 
 The bill provides that a person may be sentenced to an extended term of imprisonment for 
repeat convictions related to retail theft. A person is a persistent offender if the person has 
previously been convicted on two or more prior and separate occasions of receiving stolen 
property, shoplifting, or being a leader of organized retail theft enterprise; or theft that involves 
the stealing of merchandise, regardless of the dates of the convictions.  A persistent offender may 
be sentenced to an extended term, upon motion of the prosecutor, if the prior conviction was for a 
crime committed on a separate occasion and the crime for which the person is being sentenced was 
committed either: (1) within 10 years of the date of the defendant’s last release from confinement 
for the commission of any crime; or (2) within 10 years of the date of the commission of the most 
recent violation of a crime established in the bill for which the defendant has a prior conviction. 
 The bill provides that the value of merchandise involved in a violation of the shoplifting statute 
may be aggregated in determining the grade of the offense where the acts or conduct constituting 
a violation were committed pursuant to one scheme or course of conduct, whether from the same  FE to A4755 [2R] 
3 
 
person or several persons regardless of the time period over which the scheme or course of conduct 
took place, or were committed in furtherance of or in conjunction with an organized retail theft 
enterprise.  
 The bill updates the fencing statute to clarify that the statute also applies to online sales of 
stolen goods. The bill also separately establishes the offense of fostering the sale of stolen 
property, which is a disorderly persons offense.  A disorderly persons offense is punishable by up 
to six months imprisonment, a fine of up to $1,000, or both. 
 The bill imposes certain packaging and consumer notice requirements for the sale of gift cards 
and requires the Division of Consumer Affairs in the Department of Law and Public Safety to 
create a notice related to gift card fraud for dissemination in locations that sell gift cards. 
 Finally, the bill requires the Office of the Attorney General to undertake steps as it deems 
appropriate to promote the effective investigation, prosecution, and deterrence of organized retail 
theft in this State, which may include establishing a unit, task force, or other appropriate office or 
initiative to combat organized retail theft.   
 
 
FISCAL ANALYSIS 
 
EXECUTIVE BRANCH 
 
 None received. 
 
OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE SERVICES 
 
 The OLS concludes that establishing and upgrading certain crimes related to retail theft and 
sentencing certain defendants to extended prison terms may result in an indeterminate annual 
increase in State and local expenditures and revenues.  The OLS lacks sufficient information to 
quantify the fiscal impact, as it is not possible to estimate the number of crimes likely to be 
committed under the provisions of this bill or how many persistent offenders will be sentenced to 
extended prison terms.  Generally, a presumption of non-incarceration applies to first time 
offenders of crimes of the fourth degree and third degree.    
 The bill requires the Department of Law and Public Safety to undertake appropriate steps for 
the deterrence of organized retail theft, which may include establishing a unit or task force for the 
investigation and prosecution of such crimes in the State.  The establishment of such a unit would 
further increase annual State costs. 
 Among other provisions that could result in incarceration, the bill also provides that a person 
may be sentenced to an extended term of imprisonment for repeat convictions related to retail theft. 
As of January 1, 2024, the State prison facilities had a total of 472 individuals incarcerated for 
property offenses, which include burglary, arson, theft, forgery, embezzlement, and receiving or 
possessing stolen property.  The Department of Corrections does not provide data separated by 
offense.  This number also does not account for the aggravated assault of an employee at a retail 
mercantile establishment under the provisions of this bill, which may be covered under the “violent 
offenses” category presented in department’s 2024 Population Characteristics Report.  The OLS 
notes that to the extent the bill results in additional incarcerations, the Department of Corrections 
would incur those extra costs.  Based on information provided by the department, the FY 2023 
average annual cost for housing, ensuring security, and providing services to an incarcerated 
individual was $75,574, with an average daily cost of $207.  
 The OLS finds that expenditures are likely to increase at the local level since disorderly persons 
offenses are adjudicated in municipal courts and defendants are sentenced to county jails.  FE to A4755 [2R] 
4 
 
According to information provided by the Administrative Office of the Courts, the median daily 
cost to house an inmate in a county jail is $228.  Annual municipal revenue would also likely 
increase due to an increase in court filing fees and penalties from these disorderly persons cases. 
 
Section: Judiciary 
Analyst: Anuja Pande Joshi 
Senior Fiscal Analyst 
Approved: Thomas Koenig 
Legislative Budget and Finance Officer 
 
This fiscal note has been prepared pursuant to P.L.1980, c.67 (C.52:13B-6 et seq.).