New Jersey 2024 2024-2025 Regular Session

New Jersey Assembly Bill A5048 Comm Sub / Analysis

                    ASSEMBLY MILITARY AND VETERANS' AFFAIRS 
COMMITTEE 
 
STATEMENT TO  
 
ASSEMBLY, No. 5048  
 
STATE OF NEW JERSEY 
 
DATED:  FEBRUARY 13, 2025 
 
 The Assembly Military and Veterans' Affairs Committee reports 
favorably Assembly Bill No. 5048. 
 This bill enhances certain protections under the Law Against 
Discrimination (“LAD”). 
 MILITARY SERVICE.   Currently, the LAD bars discrimination 
based on “liability for service in the Armed Forces of the United 
States.”  The bill broadens this provision to specifically bar 
discrimination against persons currently serving in the military and 
military veterans.  The bill defines this additional protected class of 
persons as those in active service in any branch of the Armed Forces 
of the United States or National Guard, and those who have been 
discharged or released from active service in any branch of the Armed 
Forces of the United States or National Guard. 
 JOB PROTECTION FOR MILITARY SERVICE.  The bill makes 
it an unlawful employment practice under the LAD for employers to 
deny reemployment to employees who take leave for military service.  
This provision is in compliance with the federal Uniformed Services 
Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994, 18 U.S.C. s.4301 
et seq. 
 GENDER-NEUTRAL LANGUAGE.  Under the bill, gendered 
language in the LAD is changed to gender-neutral language. For 
example, in N.J.S.A.10:5-39, the provision in the LAD that sets out an 
affirmative action program for veterans, the bill replaces the phrase 
“soldier, sailor, marine, airman, nurse or army field clerk” with 
“enlisted person or officer.” 
 UNLAWFUL DISCRIMINATION.   The bill adds the term 
“unlawful” before “discrimination” throughout the LAD to clarify that 
the LAD prohibits only unlawful discrimination.  The LAD does not 
apply to discrimination that may be lawful. For example, practices 
that result in a disproportionately negative impact on members of a 
protected class constitute unlawful discrimination only if the entity 
engaging in the practices cannot show that it is using the practices for 
a substantial, legitimate, nondiscriminatory interest or cannot show 
that there is a less discriminatory alternative that meets that interest.