New Jersey Assembly Bill A5060

New Jersey 2024-2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/9/24
• Refer: 12/9/24

Caption

Requires BPU to discontinue Infrastructure Investment Program.

Impact

This bill directly impacts the regulatory landscape for public utilities in New Jersey by requiring a full rate review before any approval of infrastructure investments can be made. By discontinuing the IIP, the bill seeks to prevent the expedited financial mechanisms that have previously allowed utilities to earn accelerated returns on capital investments. This may lead to more prudent and thorough evaluations of utility projects, as each utility will need to justify its investment proposal within the context of their overall financial health during a base rate case.

Summary

Assembly Bill A5060 mandates the Board of Public Utilities (BPU) to discontinue the Infrastructure Investment Program (IIP) in New Jersey. The bill stipulates that the BPU cannot accept new petitions under this program or approve any pending petitions without conducting a comprehensive rate review for the public utility involved. This decision is aimed at enhancing transparency and accountability in the approval processes of public utility investments and ensuring that ratepayers are not subjected to unnecessary financial burdens.

Conclusion

In summary, Assembly Bill A5060 represents a significant regulatory shift intended to promote transparency and protect consumers in New Jersey's public utility sector. By eliminating the IIP, the bill not only aims to modify how utility investments are approved but also reflects a broader desire within the legislature for more rigorous control and governance of infrastructure funding. The successful passage of this bill can lead to a more equitable system for evaluating utility expenses, ensuring that ratepayer interests remain a key concern.

Contention

The impetus for A5060 arises from concerns expressed by the Division of Rate Counsel, which argues that the IIP's structure does not allow for adequate scrutiny of utility proposals. Opponents of the IIP have emphasized that it creates an environment where utilities can incur excessive expenses without comprehensive oversight, which ultimately places a heavier financial burden on ratepayers. The bill's proponents are likely to argue for greater protection for utility customers while enhancing the scrutiny of infrastructure-related financial decisions.