New Jersey Assembly Bill A575

New Jersey 2024-2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/24
• Refer: 1/9/24
• Report Pass: 5/16/24
• Engrossed: 9/26/24
• Refer: 9/30/24
• Report Pass: 6/12/25

Caption

Directs DEP to develop guidelines concerning State and local government purchase of goods made from recycled material.

Impact

The enactment of A575 is expected to have a significant influence on state procurement processes, making it a priority for government agencies to consider environmental impacts while making purchasing decisions. By mandating the use of recycled materials, the bill could potentially lead to an increase in demand for such products, stimulating the market for recycled goods. Moreover, the bill establishes a framework through which contracts awarded for goods and services must reflect these newfound guidelines to the extent that it is practical and feasible, though exceptions are made if compliance would result in increased costs.

Summary

Assembly Bill A575, introduced in the New Jersey Legislature, aims to direct the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) to establish guidelines for State and local government procurement policies that favor the purchase of goods made from recycled materials. This bill suggests a proactive approach to encourage sustainable purchasing habits among government entities, aligning with broader environmental goals to increase recycling efforts and reduce waste. The DEP is tasked with developing these guidelines within 90 days of the bill's enactment, which may incorporate standards set by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

Contention

However, there are notable points of contention surrounding the implementation of A575. One potential concern is the exemption clause for local contracting units, which allows them to bypass the guidelines if doing so would lead to increased costs. Critics may argue that this could dilute the bill's intended impact, as local governments might prioritize budget considerations over environmental objectives. Additionally, discussions could arise about the feasibility of the bill's requirements and the administrative burden placed on procurement offices adjusting to the new guidelines.