New Jersey Senate Bill S3633

New Jersey 2024-2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/19/24
• Refer: 9/19/24

Caption

Requires computerized drawing system to determine random order of candidate names for each office on primary and general election ballots; provides for drawing to be viewable in person or electronically.

Impact

The implementation of SB S3633 is expected to significantly influence how elections are managed in New Jersey by introducing a new method for determining ballot order that is both efficient and transparent. By requiring that any computerized system used must gain the prior approval of the Secretary of State, the bill aims to ensure that such systems meet established safeguards to protect against external influences. The bill also assures public access to the drawing process, as it mandates that drawings be viewable both in person and electronically, further enhancing transparency in elections.

Summary

Senate Bill S3633 aims to modernize the process of determining the order of candidates' names on primary and general election ballots in New Jersey. Under current law, county and municipal clerks draw names from a box to establish this order. S3633 proposes replacing this manual drawing process with a computerized system designed to randomly assign positions for candidates on ballots. This new method is intended to enhance the fairness and transparency of the electoral process by employing technology to eliminate any potential for bias or manipulation during the drawing process.

Contention

However, there may be some points of contention regarding this bill. Critics could raise concerns regarding the reliance on technology in the electoral process and potential complications that may arise from implementing a new system. Moreover, ensuring that the computerized drawing system is secure and free from manipulation is paramount, and any failings in this regard could undermine public trust in election outcomes. Additionally, as the bill removes the previous practice of bracketing candidates together for ballot positioning, there may be debate about the implications this has on collaborative candidacies and their visibility to voters.