New Mexico 2025 2025 Regular Session

New Mexico House Bill HB120 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/06/2025

                    Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance 
committees of the Legislature. LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they 
are used for other purposes. 
 
F I S C A L    I M P A C T    R E P O R T 
 
 
SPONSOR Lujan/Cates 
LAST UPDATED 
ORIGINAL DATE 1/26/2025 
 
SHORT TITLE Accessibility of State Agencies 
BILL 
NUMBER House Bill 120 
  
ANALYST Hernandez 
APPROPRIATION* 
(dollars in thousands) 
FY25 	FY26 
Recurring or 
Nonrecurring 
Fund 
Affected 
 $200 Recurring General Fund 
Parentheses ( ) indicate expenditure decreases. 
*Amounts reflect most recent analysis of this legislation. 
  
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT* 
(dollars in thousands) 
Agency/Program 
FY25 FY26 FY27 
3 Year 
Total Cost 
Recurring or 
Nonrecurring 
Fund 
Affected 
GSD  
No fiscal 
impact 
$10,500.0 to 
$50,000.0 
$10,500.0 to 
$50,000.0 
$10,500.0 to 
$50,000.0 
Recurring 
Other state 
funds 
Parentheses ( ) indicate expenditure decreases. 
*Amounts reflect most recent analysis of this legislation. 
 
Sources of Information
 
 
LFC Files 
 
Agency Analysis Received From 
General Services Department (GSD) Department of Information and Technology (DoIT)  
Office of Broadband Access and Expansion  
Commission on the Deaf and Hard of Hearing (CDHH) 
Health Care Authority (HCA) 
Higher Education Department (HED)  
Governor’s Commission on Disability (GDC)  
Department of Public Safety (DPS) 
 
SUMMARY 
 
Synopsis of House Bill 120   
 
House Bill 120 (HB120) appropriates $200 thousand from the general fund to the Governor’s 
Commission on Disability for the purpose of creating the Office of Accessibility. HB120 would 
mandate that all state agencies meet the requirements set by the United States Department of 
Justice in digital standards by April 1, 2026. HB120 requires that each state agency comply with 
physical accessibility standards. The Office of Accessibility would be responsible for monitoring 
compliance with the provisions of HB120 and would be required to write a report to the  House Bill 120 – Page 2 
 
Governor on April 1, 2026, and every two years thereafter documenting compliance. HB120 also 
creates a private right of action allowing an individual with a disability who is unable to access 
digital content, services or platforms, or physical facilities of a state agency due to 
noncompliance the ability to file civil action in a court.  
 
This bill does not contain an effective date and, as a result, would go into effect 90 days after the 
Legislature adjourns if enacted, or June 20, 2025. 
 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS  
 
The appropriation of $200 thousand contained in this bill is a recurring expense to the general 
fund. Any unexpended or unencumbered balance remaining at the end of FY26 shall revert to the 
general fund. While the appropriation is only for one year, the bill requires the Office of 
Accessibility to monitor compliance and publish a report every two years, meaning that the 
appropriation would likely be recurring.  
 
The General Services Department (GSD) and LFC analyses indicate that the right of private 
action could leave the state liable for damages between $10.5 million and $50 million annually. 
GSD states  
This bill allows for a private right of action, which if the state is found to be non-
compliant, could cost millions of dollars in civil action claims. This is extremely 
problematic considering the historic nature of several state-owned buildings. These 
buildings would not be able to be compliant considering the infrastructure design and 
layout and there are no exceptions or exemptions for historic buildings. Therefore, the 
state, in many cases, would not be able to come into compliance.  
 
General liability claims in New Mexico are capped at $1.05 million, while federal civil rights 
violation claims payouts are around $5 million. Assuming ten lawsuits per year, New Mexico 
could be responsible for paying out between $10.5 million and $50 million annually. 
 
LFC analysis indicates that, although agencies below list an estimated additional operating 
budget impact of at least $2.8 million, because HB120 only requires that state agencies comply 
25 days prior to the federal compliance deadline the costs associated with compliance should not 
be added to the estimated additional operating budget impact.  
 
GSD notes: 
Agencies will need to hire certified accessibility consultants to review compliance with 
ADA Standards. Building modifications, (e.g., ramps, door widths, and accessible 
seating) will likely be necessary to comply with accessibility standards. Hiring 
consultants to evaluate existing facilities, websites, and mobile applications can be 
expensive. Costs may range from $5,000 to $50,000 or more per facility or digital 
platform, depending on complexity. Costs to train staff on accessibility standards and 
compliance can range from $500 to $5,000 per session, depending on the size of the 
organization.” 
 
Similarly, the Department of Information and Technology (DoIT) indicates that it will cost $350 
thousand to bring all six websites that they manage into compliance. Moreover, “given the 
timeline provided for compliance, there will be a significant strain on state agency budgets and 
resources. Most agencies will require additional funding to cover the cost required to reconfigure  House Bill 120 – Page 3 
 
the numerous state websites to the state accessibility standard.” Finally, DoIT states that the 
agency is statutorily required to review and monitor IT procurement by state agencies. The 
agency estimates that at least 50 agencies will need to seek procurement and, as a result, DoIT 
would need an additional FTE to review and monitor the procurement requests.  
 
The Department of Public Safety’s Department will incur expenditures totaling $400 thousand 
with vendors. Additionally, they will require four new FTEs at the cost of $551 thousand in order 
to meet compliance. DPS notes that “there will also be the costs and logistics for maintenance for 
ongoing compliance. Accessibility isn’t a one-time fix but requires continuous monitoring and 
updating. Ensuring that digital platforms remain compliant with evolving standards may require 
ongoing technical expertise and resources, which could place additional strain on the 
department’s IT and digital teams.” 
 
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES 
 
GSD notes:  
On April 24, 2024, the Federal Register published the US Department of Justice’s final 
rule updating its regulations for Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). 
The final rule has specific requirements about how to ensure that web content and mobile 
applications (apps) are accessible to people with disabilities. The Web Content 
Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) Version 2.1, Level AA is the technical standard for 
state and local governments’ web content and mobile apps. State and local governments 
must make sure that their web content and mobile apps meet WCAG 2.1, Level AA 
within two or three years of when the rule was published on April 24, 2024, depending on 
their population. Because New Mexico state agencies serve a population of more than 
500,000, the compliance deadline for WCAG will be April 24, 2026.” 
 
HB120 requires that each state agency comply with the physical accessibility standards. 
However, based on the US Department of Justice’s final rule, it is unclear what, if any, new 
standards are required in terms of physical accessibility standards.  
 
The Governor’s Commission on Disability states that their “statutory responsibility is to remove 
barriers to the full integration of individuals with disabilities into the mainstream of New Mexico 
life, increase the quality of life of New Mexicans with disabilities, and to meet all the 
responsibilities and exercise all the authorities granted by law … [and the agency] stands ready 
to assist other state agencies to meet their responsibilities with support, guidance, training and 
resources.” However, it is unclear why a new office is needed within the Governor’s 
Commission on Disability to accomplish this goal as their statutory responsibility encompasses 
some of the desired work already.  
 
WHAT WILL BE THE CONSEQUENCES OF NOT ENACTING THIS BILL 
 
New Mexico will still be subject to meeting standards outlined in the US Department of Justice’s 
final rule regardless of whether HB120 is enacted. New Mexico must be in compliance with the 
final rule by April 24, 2026 to meet federal guidelines.  
 
AEH/hj