New Mexico 2025 2025 Regular Session

New Mexico House Bill HB140 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 01/31/2025

                     
 
Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance 
committees of the Legislature. LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they 
are used for other purposes. 
 
F I S C A L    I M P A C T    R E P O R T 
 
 
SPONSOR Chandle
r 
LAST UPDATED 
ORIGINAL DATE 01/31/2025 
 
SHORT TITLE 
"Hazardous Waste Constituent” 
Definition 
BILL 	NUMBER House Bill 140 
  
ANALYST Chilton 
 
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT* 
(dollars in thousands) 
Agency/Program 
FY25 FY26 FY27 
3 Year 
Total Cost 
Recurring or 
Nonrecurring 
Fund 
Affected 
NMED 
No fiscal 
impact 
No fiscal 
impact 
No fiscal 
impact 
No fiscal 
impact 
Recurring 
General 
Fund 
Parentheses ( ) indicate expenditure decreases. 
*Amounts reflect most recent analysis of this legislation. 
 
Sources of Information
 
 
LFC Files 
 
Agency Analysis Received From 
New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) 
 
Agency Analysis was Solicited but Not Received From 
New Mexico Attorney General (NMAG) 
 
Because of the short timeframe between the introduction of this bill and its first hearing, LFC has yet to receive analysis from state, education, or judicial agencies. This analysis could be updated 
if that analysis is received. 
 
SUMMARY 
 
Synopsis of House Bill 140 
 
House Bill 140 (HB140) modifies the Hazardous Waste Act (Section 74-4 NMSA 1978.) Section 
1 of the bill adds a new definition to Section 74-4-1 for a “hazardous waste constituent”, defined 
as a substance meeting the (existing) definition of “hazardous waste” and identified by the 
Environmental Improvement Board (EIB) as being subject to corrective action.  
 
Section 2 of the bill adds to EIB’s duties the making of rules regarding these hazardous waste 
constituents, removing a section of statute that currently limits EIB’s jurisdiction when a solid 
waste has not been listed by the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a hazardous 
waste.  The remainder of the list of EIB duties and responsibilities remains unchanged. 
 
This bill does not contain an effective date and, as a result, would go into effect 90 days after the 
Legislature adjourns if enacted, or June 20, 2025. 
  House Bill 140 – Page 2 
 
 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS  
 
There is no appropriation in House Bill 140. The New Mexico Environment Department 
(NMED) expects no fiscal impact of this bill except possibly a savings of money once rules are 
finalized, protecting the state from costly cleanup of certain waste. NMED gives an example, 
noting that polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS) products, which the 
agency asserts would be included under HB140’s definition of “hazardous waste constituent”, 
are not subject to a federal EPA listing and that NMED has had to spend $12 million to:  
Establish the extent of the contamination that the US Department of Defense has avoided 
paying [for PFAS contamination cleanup]. In contrast, in the State of Texas, the U.S. 
Department of Defense amicably agreed to address PFAS contamination around one such 
U.S. Air Force Base, as the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality has broader 
authority than NMED. HB140 will correct this inequity that puts New Mexicans at 
greater risk than Texans. 
 
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES 
 
The federal EPA notes that PCBs “have significant toxic effects in animals, including non-
human primates.  PCBs can affect an animal’s immune system, reproductive system, nervous 
system, and endocrine system.  These compounds were widely used until 1979.” The EPA also 
notes that current scientific research suggests that exposure to certain PFAS may lead to adverse 
health outcomes.  
 
NMED further clarifies the relationship between that agency and the federal EPA:  
Under a primacy agreement between the U.S. EPA and the State of New Mexico, NMED 
implements the Hazardous Waste Act (NMSA 1978, § 74-4-1). States that receive final 
EPA authorization must maintain a hazardous waste program that is equivalent to, 
consistent with, and no less stringent than the Federal Hazardous Waste Program. This 
means that HB140 will not grant NMED the authority to regulate any waste inconsistent 
with laws and rules. Such wastes currently excluded from federal hazardous waste 
regulation and therefore state hazardous waste regulations include: scrap metals, 
agricultural wastes, mining wastes, oil and gas wastes, etc. 
 
LAC/SL2