New Mexico 2025 2025 Regular Session

New Mexico House Bill HB163 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/07/2025

                    Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance 
committees of the Legislature. LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they 
are used for other purposes. 
 
F I S C A L    I M P A C T    R E P O R T 
 
 
SPONSOR Reeb/Hall/Chavez, N. 
LAST UPDATED 
ORIGINAL DATE 2/6/2025 
 
SHORT TITLE Additions to “Delinquent Act” 
BILL 
NUMBER House Bill 163 
  
ANALYST Garcia 
  
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT* 
(dollars in thousands) 
Agency/Program 
FY25 FY26 FY27 
3 Year 
Total Cost 
Recurring or 
Nonrecurring 
Fund 
Affected 
AODA 
Indeterminate 
but minimal 
At least $291.0 At least $291.0 $582.0 Recurring General Fund 
LOPD 
Indeterminate 
but minimal 
At least $291.0 At least $291.0 $582.0 Recurring General Fund 
CYFD (Juvenile 
Justice 
Services) 
Indeterminate 
but minimal 
$1,400.0 to 
$2,600.0 
$1,400.0 to 
$2,600.0 
$2,800.0 to 
$5,200.0 
Recurring General Fund 
AOC 
Indeterminate 
but minimal 
Indeterminate 
but minimal 
Indeterminate 
but minimal 
Indeterminate 
but minimal 
Recurring General Fund 
Total 
Indeterminate 
but minimal 
$1,982.0 to 
$3,182.0 
$1,982.0 to 
$3,182.0 
$3,964.0 to 
$6,364.0 
Recurring General Fund 
Parentheses ( ) indicate expenditure decreases. 
*Amounts reflect most recent analysis of this legislation. 
 
Conflicts with House Bill 134 
 
Sources of Information
 
 
LFC Files 
 
Agency Analysis Received From 
 Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) Administrative Office of the District Attorneys (AODA) 
Law Office of the Public Defender (LOPD) 
New Mexico Sentencing Commission 
Office of Family Representation and Advocacy (OFRA) 
Children, Youth and Families Department (CYFD) 
 
Agency Analysis was Solicited but Not Received From 
List all agencies that failed to respond to a request for analysis. 
SUMMARY 
 
Synopsis of House Bill 163   
 
House Bill 163 amends Section 32A-2-3(A) NMSA 1978 of the Delinquency Act by 
reorganizing and creating new language about alcohol-related and cannabis-related offenses. 
New violations include:  House Bill 163 – Page 2 
 
 Buying, attempting to buy, receiving, or possessing cannabis; 
 Being present in a licensed retail cannabis establishment, except in the presence of the 
child’s parent, guardian, custodian, or adult spouse; 
 Smoking a cannabis product in a public place or privately owned property or producing 
cannabis. 
 
The bill includes an exemption for medical cannabis possession under the Lynn and Eric 
Compassionate Use Act.  
 
This bill does not contain an effective date and, as a result, would go into effect 90 days after the 
Legislature adjourns if enacted, or June 20, 2025. 
 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS  
 
Incarceration drives costs in the criminal justice system; any change in the number of individuals 
in juvenile detention facilities, jail, or prison and the length of time served in juvenile detention 
or a secure facility  that might result from this bill could have significant fiscal impacts. The 
creation of any new delinquent act may increase the population of New Mexico’s juvenile secure 
facilities and being supervised in the community, consequently increasing long-term costs to 
state. 
 
Juvenile Justice Services at CYFD 
 
In 2020, the Justice Policy Institute estimated the national average cost for secure confinement of 
juvenile was $588 per day, or $214 thousand annually. The 2023 LFC Program Evaluation Unit 
progress report on Juvenile Justice Services noted the per-client cost in a secure juvenile justice 
facility was $383 thousand, though the evaluation noted the cost per client had increased 44 
percent since FY19, as the number of clients in secure facilities decreased. The bill could result 
in more juveniles placed in secure facilities, increasing JJS costs.  
 
The bill would result in more referrals of Delinquent Act offenses to Juvenile Justice Services, 
which would require CYFD to respond to referrals and supervise more juveniles.  CYFD notes, 
since a pandemic low, JJS has experienced an annual increase of 1,000 referrals to JJS, almost all 
from law enforcement, and projects an increase of up to 900 referrals annually associated with 
Delinquency Act changes proposed in the bill.  
 
CYFD projects JJS would need to hire 10 additional juvenile probation officers to assist with 
handling the projected increase in referrals at a cost of $1.4 million annually. The 2023 LFC 
juvenile justice report estimated the per-referrals, per-year cost of field supervision to be $2,900, 
which could translate to increased costs of up to $2.6 million annually.  
 
Thus, this analysis assumes increased costs to CYFD JJS ranging between $1.4 million and $2.6 
million, given the projected increase in referrals. In recent years, JJS actual expenditures have 
been below budgeted levels, and CYFD could potentially absorb some of the cost increases 
within their existing budget.  
 
Judiciary 
 
AOC reports the courts would likely experience minimal administrative costs associated with  House Bill 163 – Page 3 
 
updating, distributing, and documenting statutory changes, and any bill that results in additional 
hearings or caseloads in the court may result in increased costs. The courts did not provide a 
precise estimate for fiscal impact.  
 
LOPD notes offenders would be entitled to public defender representation, resulting in the need 
for additional attorneys and administrative costs. LOPD estimates the need for an additional 
attorney, including benefits, support staff, and operating costs, to be roughly $291 thousand 
annually.  
 
AODA also reports the bill could increase case filings against delinquent children and, thereby, 
increase the workload of district attorneys’ offices and administrative costs. AODA did not 
provide a specific cost estimate. This analysis assumes AODA may have additional costs at a 
level similar to LOPD.  
 
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES 
 
The bill makes cannabis-related offenses delinquent acts under the Delinquency Act, which 
applies to juveniles, and groups them in the same subsection as alcohol-related offenses. The bill 
references Section 26-2C-30 NMSA 1978, stating the offenses pursuant to that statute of 
“buying, attempting to buy, receiving or possessing cannabis” are delinquent acts and increases 
consequences to a juvenile for these actions. 
 
Section 26-2C-30 provides that a person under 21 shall not possess cannabis products and a 
person in violation is guilty of a civil violation, resulting in a sentence to a four-hour drug 
education course and four hours of community service.  
 
Delinquent offenses are punishable for up to two years in a juvenile facility.  
 
CYFD reports, prior to New Mexico’s legalization of cannabis in 2021, the possession of 
cannabis was a delinquent offense and in the top 15 delinquent offenses received by JJS each 
year. JJS reported 800 to 1,000 referrals annually in FY16 through FY19.  
 
Due to the widespread access, availability, and use of cannabis, CYFD JJS anticipates a 
significant increase in referrals to JJS should this bill be enacted.  
 
AOC notes House Bill 163 would criminalize offenses for children that would only be civil 
penalties for adults under the age of 21: 
Section 26-2C-30 NMSA 1978 makes a person who violates this subsection is guilty of a 
civil violation. Meanwhile, possession of alcohol by a minor, also listed as a delinquent 
act in Section 60-7B-1 NMSA 1978 is a criminal offense punishable by a misdemeanor.  
 
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS 
 
AOC notes the courts reports on performance-measures related to cases disposes and cases filed, 
and this bill could impact performance on these measures. 
 
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP 
  House Bill 163 – Page 4 
 
House Bill 163 conflicts with House Bill 134, which makes broad changes to the Delinquency 
Act within the Children’s Code, some of which conflict with the organization of House Bill 163.  
 
TECHNICAL ISSUES 
 
Several agencies note the language and punctuation in Subsection A as drafted are confusing and 
redundant.  
 
 
RMG/rl/hg