New Mexico 2025 2025 Regular Session

New Mexico House Bill HB299 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/10/2025

                    Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance 
committees of the Legislature. LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they 
are used for other purposes. 
 
F I S C A L    I M P A C T    R E P O R T 
 
 
SPONSOR Hall/Lundstrom/Hernandez, J. 
LAST UPDATED 2/10/2025 
ORIGINAL DATE 2
/07/2025 
 
SHORT TITLE State Law Enforcement Instructor PERA 
BILL 
NUMBER House Bill 299 
  
ANALYST Hanika-Ortiz 
 
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT* 
(dollars in thousands) 
Agency/Program 
FY25 *FY26 *FY27 
*3 Year 
Total Cost 
Recurring or 
Nonrecurring 
Fund 
Affected 
PERA 
Indeterminate 
but minimal 
Indeterminate 
but minimal 
Indeterminate 
but minimal 
 Recurring PERA trust fund 
DPS (employer 
contributions) 
Indeterminate 
but minimal 
$3.6 $3.7 $7.3 Recurring General Fund 
Parentheses ( ) indicate expenditure decreases. 
*Amounts reflect most recent analysis of this legislation. 
 
Relates to Senate Bill 173, Telecommunicators as Police in PERA 
 
Sources of Information
 
 
LFC Files 
 
Agency Analysis Received From 
Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) 
Department of Public Safety (DPS) 
 
SUMMARY 
 
Synopsis of House Bill 299   
 
House Bill 299 (HB299) amends the Public Employees Retirement Act (PERA) Section 10-11-2 
NMSA 1978 to create a state law enforcement instructor member which is a member who 
maintains a law enforcement certification and is employed by the New Mexico Law 
Enforcement Academy (NMLEA) to provide training pursuant to the Law Enforcement Training 
Act.
 Members that meet this new definition would be covered under a State Public Safety 
Member Coverage Plan.  
 
The bill requires PERA to hold an election to allow members in a position covered by the new 
state law enforcement instructor member definition (currently under State General Member 
Coverage Plan 3), to elect to join State Public Safety Member Coverage Plan 1. If adopted, the 
service credit accrued by members after July 1, 2025, would increase by 20 percent. Also, Tier 2 
members would be transitioned to a 25-year retirement plan with no enhancements. 
 
The bill includes a temporary provision that on or before June 30, 2025, PERA will hold an 
election to submit to members the question of adopting State Public Safety Member Coverage 1.  House Bill 299 – Page 2 
 
 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS  
 
If this bill is signed into law and the instructor members elect coverage, these positions would 
transition to the State Public Safety Member Coverage Plan 1, as well as to the New Mexico 
Retiree Health Care Authority’s enhanced plan for police, at higher employer contribution rates.
 
The 
Department of Public Safety (DPS) projects the additional costs at approximately $3,600 per 
year, increasing each year with payroll growth, which would be absorbed by the NMLEA’s 
general fund operating budget. To cover costs, DPS may need additional budget authority or a 
higher general fund appropriation.   
 
As of June 30, 2024, the State Public Safety Member Coverage Plan 1 has a funded ratio of 124 
percent. However, contributions, no matter the source, accumulate for the benefit of all PERA 
members. As of June 30, 2024, the funded status of the entire system was 67 percent. This means 
the plan is underfunded; projected assets may not be sufficient to cover all benefits promised. 
 
Despite the risks and challenges of increasing benefits only for some members, PERA reports the 
change would have a negligible impact to the unfunded portion of its long-term liabilities.  
 
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES 
 
DPS noted 
7 full-time permanent instructor positions that would be eligible to vote in the election. 
 
Law enforcement instructors currently under State General Member Coverage Plan 3 would 
transition to State Public Safety Member Coverage Plan 1, if in an election they decide to do so. 
The State General Member Coverage Plan 3 is structured for state employees who have longer 
service periods before retirement than public safety employees. Plans geared toward public 
safety allow an earlier retirement, due to the physically demanding and higher risks of the work.  
 
Of note, different benefit levels between public employees create perceptions of unfairness, 
leading to decreased morale. Employees in groups with lower benefits often feel undervalued.   
 
PERFORMANCE IMPLICATIONS 
 
PERA noted that HB299 will not impact its performance measures. 
 
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP 
 
This bill relates to Senate Bill 173 Telecommunicators as Police in PERA which would make 
telecommunicators eligible to join a public safety plan under PERA for an increased benefit.   
 
TECHNICAL ISSUES 
 
In November 2024, PERA was asked to clarify the status of these instructors, at the request of 
DPS. It was concluded that under State statute, in addition to the New Mexico Administrative 
Code, the instructors did not qualify as a “police member,” disqualifying them from moving to a 
public safety plan “Although the position requires a current New Mexico police officer 
certification, the instructor position is not an officer of the New Mexico State Police as required  House Bill 299 – Page 3 
 
by statute.” Further, a member employed as both a police officer and non-police officer 
employee shall be regarded as a police member only if more than 50 percent of their salary is 
paid as a police officer with law enforcement duties. Although NMLEA plays a crucial role in 
training officers, DPS noted, their primary job function does not include being paid 50 percent of 
salary as a police officer. Therefore, it was concluded these positions were correctly classified.  
 
OTHER SUBSTANT IVE ISSUES 
 
DPS also commented on changes instructors would see regarding contributions, overtime pay, 
and social security benefits, which are different for public safety plan members. For instance, if 
instructors are added to the State Police plan, overtime would only be paid after a 40-hour week 
as opposed to the 84th hour onward in an 80-hour period. In addition, at retirement they would 
rely solely on their PERA pension, which replaces social security for their years of service. 
 
ALTERNATIVES 
 
DPS suggested amending the PERA plan for “peace officer” which is defined as “any employee 
of the state with a duty to maintain public order or to make arrests for crimes…and who is not 
specifically covered by another coverage plan." Peace officers include conservation officers at 
the Department of Game and Fish. However, new members are only eligible for TIER 2. PERA 
may be able to open TIER 1 to the instructors, many of whom have served more than 10 years. 
 
AHO/hj/hg