New Mexico 2025 2025 Regular Session

New Mexico House Bill HB65 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/20/2025

                     
 
Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance 
committees of the Legislature. LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they 
are used for other purposes. 
 
F I S C A L    I M P A C T    R E P O R T 
 
 
SPONSOR Armstrong
/Dow 
LAST UPDATED 
ORIGINAL DATE 2/19/25 
 
SHORT TITLE Instructional Days in School Year 
BILL 
NUMBER House Bill 65/ec 
  
ANALYST Liu 
 
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT* 
(dollars in thousands) 
Agency/Program 
FY25 FY26 FY27 
3 Year 
Total Cost 
Recurring or 
Nonrecurring 
Fund 
Affected 
School Boards 
Indeterminate 
but minimal 
   General Fund 
Parentheses ( ) indicate expenditure decreases. 
*Amounts reflect most recent analysis of this legislation. 
 
Relates to House Bill 238 
 
Sources of Information
 
 
LFC Files 
Legislative Education Study Committee (LESC) Files 
 
Agency Analysis was Solicited but Not Received From 
Public Education Department (PED) 
SUMMARY 
 
Synopsis of House Bill 65 
 
House Bill 65 amends Section 22-2-8.1. NMSA 1978, making local school boards and governing 
bodies of charter schools responsible for determining the total number of instructional days per 
year and number of instructional days per week that students will be in school programs. The bill 
includes an emergency clause, which would make the law become effective immediately on 
signature by the governor. 
 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS  
 
The bill does not contain an appropriation but requires governing boards for school districts and 
charter schools to set school calendars. Extensions of the school calendar through additional 
instructional days may pose additional costs to the state from the generation of new K-12 Plus 
program units in the public school funding formula; however, general public resistance to longer 
school years suggests this is unlikely. 
 
 
  House Bill 65/ec – Page 2 
 
 
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES 
 
In 2008, the Legislature commissioned the American Institutes for Research (AIR) to study and 
determine the cost of a sufficient education for all public schools in New Mexico. Findings 
suggested at the time that state support for public schools should increase by $335.8 million to 
extend the school year, add afterschool hours, provide summer programs, reduce class sizes, and 
hire appropriate school personnel. The most expensive component of AIR’s cost proposal was 
extending the school year to include 185 instructional days for students and four planning days 
for teachers (about 1,512 hours). 
 
In 2009, the Legislature appropriated $14 million to the state equalization guarantee (SEG) 
distribution for schools to add one additional instructional day. However, a 2018 LFC evaluation 
found school calendars had instead shrunk by about 3 days between FY09 and FY18. Despite 
funding to expand the school year, schools had shortened calendars by moving from a 5-day 
school week to a 4-day school week schedule or by decreasing total days while adding minutes 
to each day.  
 
In 2018, the 1st Judicial District Court ruled in the Martinez-Yazzie education sufficiency lawsuit 
that New Mexico’s education system was not constitutionally sufficient nor uniform for all 
students. The court found evidence-based interventions that added instructional time like 
prekindergarten, K-3 Plus extended school year, summer school, afterschool, and extended 
learning time programs could help students close achievement gaps. Additionally, high-quality 
teachers serving at-risk students were necessary. However, the state had not provided sufficient 
funding to cover programming for all students needing intervention, and administrative hurdles 
and timing of funds limited some participation in the interventions. The court also found the state 
lacked adequate numbers of quality educators and school leaders to provide appropriate 
instruction and support for at-risk students, noting the state should increase compensation and 
training for teachers to provide a constitutionally-sufficient education. 
 
In response to the court’s findings, the Legislature significantly increased at-risk funding, 
educator pay, and early childhood programming in FY20. Additionally, the state expanded its 
existing instructional time intervention, K-3 Plus to K-5 Plus, which allowed all elementary 
schools to add 25 school days, and created a new Extended Learning Time (ELT) program, 
which allowed any school to add 10 school days, afterschool programming, and 80 hours of 
professional development. Additionally, voters passed a constitutional amendment in 2022 that 
increased land grant permanent fund distributions to expand early childhood education, boost 
funding for at-risk students, raise teacher pay, and extend the school year. Despite these 
investments, participation in K-5 Plus and ELT fell short of appropriation levels, and schools 
reverted over half a billion dollars from these two programs over the course of four years. 
 
In FY24, the state replaced K-5 Plus and ELT programs with a K-12 Plus funding formula factor 
and new annual requirements of 1,140 instructional hours, which allowed elementary schools to 
count 60 professional work hours toward the requirement but only 30 hours for middle and high 
schools. Legislative amendments in the 2023 legislative session changed the secondary 
allowance (originally 60 hours) in response to concerns that staggered transportation schedules in 
some districts would require fewer professional work hours for secondary schools.  
 
 
  House Bill 65/ec – Page 3 
 
 
As a result of “blending” instructional time requirements with professional work hours, PED 
flagged in FY24 that nearly half of districts and charter schools had reduced the number of 
school hours and days in their calendar that year. Many schools had already provided more 
instructional time than the new minimums and had reduced time in response to the new law. 
Others began counting more professional work time as instructional time based on the new 
definition and provided fewer classroom hours with students. Still, about half of schools 
increased instructional days and hours.  
 
In response, the Public Education Department (PED) proposed a new rule requiring schools to 
provide at least 180 days of instruction if they failed to meet reading proficiency and growth 
targets. The New Mexico School Superintendents Association, in conjunction with 53 school 
boards and four charter school governing boards, filed for a temporary restraining order and 
injunction of PED’s 180-day rule. On February 3, 2025, the 5
th
 Judicial District Court ruled in 
favor of the superintendents, nullifying the department’s rule because of conflicts with existing 
statutes and legislative intent. Currently, PED has 30 days to respond to the court order. 
 
In general, research suggests both the quantity and quality of instructional time matters for 
student academic achievement. Given historic resistance to increasing classroom time and school 
calendars, it is unlikely this bill would increase instructional time.  
 
In light of recent reported drops in national student reading and math scores, national research 
reports have indicated learning loss and larger achievement gaps were caused by disruptions 
during the Covid-19 pandemic. Most studies point to the effects of school closures, high 
absenteeism, classroom disruptions, and inefficient teaching practices as variables leading to 
lower academic achievement. Recent LFC evaluations on learning time and attendance have 
been aligned with these findings, indicating the amount of instructional time and the quality of 
that instructional time matter for student achievement—particularly for at-risk students. 
 
In recent years, more school districts have switched to a 4-day school week calendar to reduce 
operating costs, attract teachers, increase time for instructional planning, and improve 
attendance. In 2009, about 120 districts nationwide were operating a 4-day week compared to 
876 districts in 2023. In New Mexico, this transition was stalled between FY19 and FY24 by 
language in the General Appropriations Act prohibiting new districts or charters from switching 
to a 4-day school week. The surge in shorter school weeks nationwide has increased the number 
of studies and attention on the model, which generally suggest the change to the 4-week schedule 
may: 
 
 Result in lower student achievement, particularly in the long run and in urban areas, 
 Not save much money, considering employee salaries and benefits, 
 Not substantively change student attendance rates, 
 Result in higher staff morale, and 
 Be associated with fewer fights and bullying incidents in high school. 
 
Notably, schools that deliver an equal amount or more instructional time to their students after 
the change do not see the same negative impacts that districts with shorter days see. 
 
 
  House Bill 65/ec – Page 4 
 
 
 
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP 
 
This bill relates to House Bill 238, which authorizes middle and high schools to count an 
additional 30 professional work hours as instructional hours. 
 
TECHNICAL ISSUES 
 
The bill amends Section 22-2-8.1. NMSA 1978, a section of law describing powers of PED and 
the Public Education Commission, to give governing boards of districts and charters the 
authority to set school calendars. As such, this creates more ambiguity about whether governing 
boards or PED have jurisdiction over instructional time. For example, in Subsection E of this 
section, the statute refers to PED’s secretary having the authority to waive the minimum length 
of school days.  
 
OTHER SUBSTANT IVE ISSUES 
 
The average number of school days has continued to increase in recent years, following a dip in 
days reported in 2018. However, new reported calendar data beginning in FY24 includes 
professional workdays, which masks potential net increases in classroom days. 
 
 
SL/hj