New Mexico 2025 2025 Regular Session

New Mexico Senate Bill SB133 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/06/2025

                    Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance 
committees of the Legislature. LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they 
are used for other purposes. 
 
F I S C A L    I M P A C T    R E P O R T 
 
 
SPONSOR Stewart/Wirth 
LAST UPDATED 
ORIGINAL DATE 2/6/2025 
 
SHORT TITLE Educational Retirees Returning to Work 
BILL 
NUMBER Senate Bill 133 
  
ANALYST Hanika-Ortiz 
 
 
REVENUE* 
(dollars in thousands) 
Type FY25 FY26 FY27 FY28 FY29 
Recurring or 
Nonrecurring 
Fund 
Affected 
Contributions  
($220.0 to 
$1,100.0)  
($227.0 to 
$1,133.0) 
($233.0 to 
$1,167.0) 
($233.0 to 
$1,167.0) 
Recurring 
ERB Trust 
Fund 
Parentheses ( ) indicate revenue decreases. 
*Amounts reflect most recent analysis of this legislation. 
  
Relates to House Bill 254 and Senate Bills 165, 251, and 292 
 
Sources of Information
 
 
LFC Files 
Agency Analysis Received From 
New Mexico Independent Community Colleges (NMICC) Central New Mexico Community College (CNMCC) New Mexico Highlands University (NMHU) New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology (NMIMT) 
University of New Mexico (UNM) 
Educational Retirement Board (ERB) 
New Mexico Public Schools Insurance Authority (NMPSIA) 
 
SUMMARY 
 
Synopsis of Senate Bill 133   
 
Senate Bill 133 (SB133) amends Section 22-11-25.1 NMSA 1978 of the Educational Retirement 
Act to raise the maximum amount a retiree may earn per year from reemployment with an 
affiliated employer, from $15 thousand to $25 thousand, without suspending their retirement 
benefits. 
 
This bill does not contain an effective date and, as a result, would go into effect 90 days after the 
Legislature adjourns if enacted, or June 20, 2025. 
 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS  
 
ERB reported that return-to-work pay under the $15 thousand salary cap exception was $2.7  Senate Bill 133 – Page 2 
 
million in 2024. If the salary cap is increased to $25 thousand, ERB estimates the fund would 
lose $220 thousand per year, from contributions that would have been made from hiring a non-
retired employee member. Further, under ERB’s normal return-to-work program, there is no 
salary cap, but both employee and employer contributions must be made. If reemployed retirees 
decide to work under the return-to-work salary exception, because of the increase, they will no 
longer need to make non-refundable contributions to the fund, nor would their employers, and 
the fund would lose $1.1 million per year in contributions to pay down the unfunded liability. 
ERB’s trust fund grows through a combination of payroll contributions and compounded 
interest, a delicate balance.   
 
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES 
 
Under normal circumstances, ERB retirees wait 90 consecutive days before reentering the 
workforce with an ERB-affiliated employer. These retirees may work for up to 36 non-
consecutive months while continuing to receive retirement benefits. During the reemployment 
period, both retirees and employers must make non-refundable contributions to ensure the fund 
remains stable.  
 
To address workforce shortages in education, particularly in STEM fields and special education, 
ERB established return-to-work exceptions to allow retired educational employees that collect 
retirement benefits re-enter the workforce, while ensuring the pension system remains stable.  
Institutions report that they rehire retirees under two return-to-work exceptions: the maximum 
salary provision that this bill seeks to change, and the less than .25 FTE time worked provision. 
Since the $15 thousand maximum salary provision was implemented, return-to-work faculty and 
staff pay has increased. Although well-intentioned, a higher threshold may incentivize more 
active educational members to retire earlier than they might have and return to employment, 
since they could earn up to $25 thousand per year without making contributions and still collect 
their pension benefits.   
 
OTHER SUBSTANT IVE ISSUES 
 
Return-to-work programs help retirees stay engaged and contribute their expertise in a 
temporary, part-time or flexible capacity. One of the critical aspects of return-to-work programs 
is that the re-employment provisions must not have a negative impact on the trust fund.  Article 
XX, Section 22 of the New Mexico Constitution prohibits the Legislature from enacting any law 
that increases the benefits paid unless adequate funding is provided. This section also assigns 
ERB the sole and exclusive power to adopt actuarial assumptions, using an independent actuary 
of its choosing. 
 
CONFLICT, DUPLICATION, COMPANIONSHIP, RELATIONSHIP 
 
This bill relates to House Bill 254 Educational Retirees Returning to Work Time Period, which 
increases the time a retiree may work after retirement to 84 months, from 36 months, without 
suspending benefits. 
 
This bill relates to Senate Bill 165 Return to Work for Lifeguards, which adds conditions under 
the Public Employees Retirement Act, alongside other public safety positions. 
  Senate Bill 133 – Page 3 
 
This bill relates to Senate Bill 251 Certain Retirees Returning to Work, which expands definition 
of “peace officer.” 
 
This bill relates to Senate Bill 292 Protective Service Workers Returning to Work, which adds 
conditions under the Public Employees Retirement Act, alongside other public safety positions. 
 
AHO/hj