New Mexico 2025 2025 Regular Session

New Mexico Senate Bill SB161 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 01/31/2025

                    Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance 
committees of the Legislature. LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they 
are used for other purposes. 
 
F I S C A L    I M P A C T    R E P O R T 
 
 
SPONSOR Padilla
/Pope 
LAST UPDATED 
ORIGINAL DATE 01/31/2025 
 
SHORT TITLE Background Checks for DMA 
Emplo
yees 
BILL 
NUMBER Senate Bill 161 
  
ANALYST Chilton 
 
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT* 
(dollars in thousands) 
Agency/Program 
FY25 FY26 FY27 
3 Year 
Total Cost 
Recurring or 
Nonrecurring 
Fund 
Affected 
DMA 
No fiscal 
impact 
No fiscal 
impact 
No fiscal 
impact 
No fiscal 
impact 
Recurring General Fund 
Parentheses ( ) indicate expenditure decreases. 
*Amounts reflect most recent analysis of this legislation. 
 
Sources of Information
 
 
LFC Files 
 
Agency Analysis Received From 
State Personnel Office (SPO) Department of Military Affairs (DMA) Agency Analysis was Solicited but Not Received From 
New Mexico Attorney General (NMAG)  Because of the short timeframe between the introduction of this bill and its first hearing, LFC has yet to receive analysis from this agency. This analysis could be updated if that analysis is 
received. 
 
SUMMARY 
 
Synopsis of Senate Bill 161.   
 
Senate Bill 161 (SB161) enacts a new section of Section 20-3 NMSA 1978, which deals with the 
Department of Military Affairs (DMA). SB161 requires that DMA and facilities operated by that 
department conduct criminal background checks on applicants, employees, and volunteers who 
will be in contact with youth in all youth programs operated by DMA.  This is to include all such 
persons already working in these capacities unless they have previously undergone a criminal 
background check. If done on an already employed or deployed person, the background checks 
must be completed within six months, during which time that person would be under close 
supervision by a person who has had the criminal background check. New potential employees 
or volunteers could be taken on provisionally but would also be required to have close 
supervision.  Potential employees or volunteers must pay the costs for the background check and 
must sign to give permission for the check to be done. 
  Senate Bill 161 – Page 2 
 
Information obtained by these means is to be kept private but used in employment or 
deployment.  Previous convictions for sex crimes, crimes involving drugs, or offenses involving 
minors or others that might affect an applicant’s suitability for a position are grounds for denying 
an application or revoking permission; if such charges have been proffered but not adjudicated, 
the applicant may be suspended or placed in a different position that does not involve youth 
contact. 
 
Section 2 of the bill amends Section 20-3-2 NMSA 1978 with the following consequence: Funds 
available to the adjutant general may be used to support youth programs. 
 
This bill does not contain an effective date and, as a result, would go into effect 90 days after the 
Legislature adjourns if enacted, or June 20, 2025. 
 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS  
 
There is no appropriation in SB161. 
 
There is no fiscal impact of the bill to DMA or other government entities for cost of criminal 
background checks as those must be borne by the applicant. 
 
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES 
 
As noted by the State Personnel Office (SPO), the fact that an applicant or potential volunteer 
must pay for the criminal background check may deter potential applicants or volunteers from 
applying. 
 
TECHNICAL ISSUES 
 
According to SPO, “While limitations related to sharing information obtained in the report is 
addressed, it is unclear whether the background report itself is confidential, whether it will be 
considered a public record pursuant to the Inspection of Public Records Act [Chapter 14, Article 
2 NMSA 1978], and whether it is an employment record under 1.7.1.12 NMAC.” 
 
SPO also indicates that, “The wording of SB161 is often vague in sections relating to employees, 
applicants or volunteers. Some qualify wording to be associated with working with minors. Clear 
wording regarding all employees, all applicants, and all volunteers working with minors or only 
employees, applicants and volunteers working with minors would be helpful.” 
 
LAC/SL2