New Mexico 2025 2025 Regular Session

New Mexico Senate Bill SB167 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/09/2025

                    Fiscal impact reports (FIRs) are prepared by the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC) for standing finance 
committees of the Legislature. LFC does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of these reports if they 
are used for other purposes. 
 
F I S C A L    I M P A C T    R E P O R T 
 
 
SPONSOR Padilla 
LAST UPDATED 
ORIGINAL DATE 2
/7/25 
 
SHORT TITLE Early Childhood Trust Fund 
BILL 
NUMBER Senate Bill 167 
  
ANALYST Klundt 
APPROPRIATION* 
(dollars in thousands) 
FY25 	FY26 
Recurring or 
Nonrecurring 
Fund 
Affected 
 $210,000.0 Recurring 
Early Childhood 
Education and Care 
Fund 
Parentheses ( ) indicate expenditure decreases. 
*Amounts reflect most recent analysis of this legislation. 
 
ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT* 
(dollars in thousands) 
Agency/Program 
FY26 FY27 FY28 
3 Year 
Total Cost 
Recurring or 
Nonrecurring 
Fund 
Affected 
HCA  
$22,900.0 to 
$28,500.0 
$22,900.0 to 
$28,500.0 
$45,800.0 to 
$57,000.0 
Recurring General Fund 
ECECD  
$11,000.0 to 
$19,700.0 
$11,000.0 to 
$19,700.0 
$22,100.0 to 
$39,400.0 
Recurring General Fund 
Total  
$33,900.0 to 
$48,200.0 
$33,900.0 to 
$48,200.0 
$67,900.0 to 
$96,400.0 
Recurring General Fund 
Parentheses ( ) indicate expenditure decreases. 
*Amounts reflect most recent analysis of this legislation. 
 
Relates to Senate Joint Resolution 6 
 
Sources of Information
 
 
LFC Files 
 
Agency Analysis Received From 
Early Childhood Education and Care Department (ECECD) State Investment Council (SIC) 
SUMMARY 
 Senate Bill 167 (SB167) proposes updates to the statutes governing the early childhood 
education and care fund upon the ratification of the constitutional amendment introduced by 
Senate Joint Resolution 6 (SJR6). The proposed changes include: 
 Increasing the annual distribution from the fund from $250 million to $500 million, 
 Renaming the fund to the early childhood trust fund, 
 Requiring consultation with the Early Childhood Education and Care Department 
(ECECD) for investments into the fund,  Senate Bill 167 – Page 2 
 
 Clarifying that, under the constitutional amendment proposed by Senate Joint Resolution 
6 (SJR6), the fund may only be used for “prenatal programs and services and for early 
childhood programs and services for children until they are eligible for kindergarten.” 
 
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS  
 
SB167 limits eligible appropriation for the early childhood trust fund to “prenatal programs and 
services and for early childhood programs and services for children until they are eligible for 
kindergarten.” This limiting language would result in appropriations from the fund for ECECD 
department operations, marketing, indirect services, and transfers to Medicaid authorized by 
previous Legislatures to be ineligible for these revenues. LFC estimates this would result in an 
estimated $33.9 million to $48.9 million in trust fund revenue that would need to be replaced by 
general fund revenues.  
 
Additionally, the bill diverts or “earmarks” revenue, representing a recurring loss from the 
general fund. LFC has concerns with including continuing distribution language in the statutory 
provisions for funds because earmarking reduces the ability of the Legislature to establish 
spending priorities. 
 
SIC reports the balance in the early childhood education and care fund, which would be 
transferred to the to-be-created early childhood trust fund, was $9.015 billion as of December 31, 
2024. The ECTF would also receive all the same recurring revenue sources currently received by 
the ECECF: 
1. Oil and gas emergency school tax revenues in excess of the five-year annual average 
receipts of these funds, 
2. Federal mineral leasing revenue in excess of the five-year annual average receipts of 
these funds.  
 
From SIC: 
Based on current law, the ECECF annually distributes the greater of $250 million or 5 
percent of the prior three-year average market value. Without any changes, the FY26 
distribution from the trust fund would be $303.3 million. Using consensus revenue 
estimate assumptions for inflows and returns, the ECECF would distribute an estimated 
$410.9 million to the program fund in FY27, and distributions could begin to exceed 
$500 million a year in FY28 or FY29.  
 
SB167 (and SJR6) increases the minimum required annual distribution from the 
ECECF/ECTF from $250 million to $500 million, which would effectively “speed up” 
the timing for the trust fund to begin making distributions of this size or greater.  
  Senate Bill 167 – Page 3 
 
  Source: SIC 
 
The fiscal impact is an additional $196.7 million from the corpus of the trust fund to the program 
fund in FY26, and an estimated additional $89.1 million from the corpus of the trust fund to the 
program fund in FY27.  
 
 
Source: LFC Files and ECECD 
 
SIGNIFICANT ISSUES 
 ECECD reports the department would use the additional revenue proposed under this bill to 
expand services, which could include prekindergarten, childcare assistance, and home visiting.   Senate Bill 167 – Page 4 
 
The SIC table below shows the long-term estimated impact of this “speed up” to the corpus of 
trust fund and the size of the distributions to the program fund using a 5 percent long-term 
annual return assumption, consistent with the assumptions of the Consensus Revenue Estimating 
Group (CREG), which consists of economist from the Legislative Finance Committee and 
executive branch. 
 
Using a 5 percent return assumption results in a “flattening” of the long-term fiscal impact 
because the interest earnings on the trust fund corpus is assumed to be equal to the 5 percent 
distribution rate to the program fund.  
 
5% Long Term Return Assumption (Consensus Revenue Estimate)       
Trust Fund Market Value 	Distributions to Program Fund 
Calendar 
Year  Current Proposed Difference 
Fiscal 
year Current Proposed Difference 
2020  $          306.1   $          306.1   $                 ‐    FY20        $                 ‐    
2021  $          314.1   $          314.1   $                 ‐    FY21        $                 ‐    
2022  $      3,462.0   $      3,462.0   $                 ‐    FY22  $             20.0   $             20.0   $                 ‐    
2023  $      5,721.2   $      5,721.2   $                 ‐    FY23  $             30.0   $             30.0   $                 ‐    
2024  $      9,015.8   $      9,015.8   $                 ‐    FY24  $          150.0   $          150.0   $                 ‐    
2025  $      9,918.0   $      9,721.3   $        (196.7) FY25  $          250.0   $          250.0   $                 ‐    
2026  $    10,893.8   $    10,598.2   $        (295.6) FY26  $          303.3   $          500.0   $          196.7  
2027  $    11,529.0   $    11,215.8   $        (313.3) FY27  $          410.9   $          500.0   $             89.1  
2028  $    12,022.9   $    11,707.4   $        (315.5) FY28  $          497.1   $          500.0   $               2.9  
2029  $    12,603.0   $    12,287.1   $        (315.9) FY29  $          539.0   $          525.6   $          (13.4) 
2030  $    12,920.4   $    12,604.5   $        (315.9) FY30  $          574.1   $          558.7   $          (15.4) 
2031  $    13,199.2   $    12,883.3   $        (315.9) FY31  $          602.6   $          586.8   $          (15.7) 
2032  $    13,432.7   $    13,116.8   $        (315.9) FY32  $          625.8   $          610.0   $          (15.8) 
2033  $    13,580.5   $    13,264.6   $        (315.9) FY33  $          645.4   $          629.6   $          (15.8) 
2034  $    13,648.2   $    13,332.2   $        (315.9) FY34  $          659.2   $          643.4   $          (15.8) 
2035  $    13,668.5   $    13,352.5   $        (315.9) FY35  $          670.2   $          654.4   $          (15.8) 
2036  $    13,670.3   $    13,354.4   $        (315.9) FY36  $          677.7   $          661.9   $          (15.8) 
2037  $    13,670.7   $    13,354.8   $        (315.9) FY37  $          681.6   $          665.8   $          (15.8) 
2038  $    13,670.7   $    13,354.8   $        (315.9) FY38  $          683.1   $          667.3   $          (15.8) 
2039  $    13,670.7   $    13,354.8   $        (315.9) FY39  $          683.5   $          667.7   $          (15.8) 
2040  $    13,670.7   $    13,354.8   $        (315.9) FY40  $          683.5   $          667.7   $          (15.8) 
2041  $    13,670.7   $    13,354.8   $        (315.9) FY41  $          683.5   $          667.7   $          (15.8) 
2042  $    13,670.7   $    13,354.8   $        (315.9) FY42  $          683.5   $          667.7   $          (15.8) 
2043  $    13,670.7   $    13,354.8   $        (315.9) FY43  $          683.5   $          667.7   $          (15.8) 
2044  $    13,670.7   $    13,354.8   $        (315.9) FY44  $          683.5   $          667.7   $          (15.8) 
2045  $    13,670.7   $    13,354.8   $        (315.9) FY45  $          683.5   $          667.7   $          (15.8) 
2046  $    13,670.7   $    13,354.8   $        (315.9) FY46  $          683.5   $          667.7   $          (15.8) 
2047  $    13,670.7   $    13,354.8   $        (315.9) FY47  $          683.5   $          667.7   $          (15.8) 
2048  $    13,670.7   $    13,354.8   $        (315.9) FY48  $          683.5   $          667.7   $          (15.8) 
2049  $    13,670.7   $    13,354.8   $        (315.9) FY49  $          683.5   $          667.7   $          (15.8) 
2050  $    13,670.7   $    13,354.8   $        (315.9) FY50  $          683.5   $          667.7   $          (15.8) 
 
 
  Senate Bill 167 – Page 5 
 
ADMINISTRATIVE IMPLICATIONS  
 
SIC reports, by transitioning the statutory ECECF to a new constitutional ECTF, it is unclear 
whether SIC would be required to create new accounting mechanisms to transfer assets from an 
old account to a new account, or if the fund could simply be renamed for SIC’s accounting 
purposes. SIC will need to consult with the Department of Finance and Administration, the State 
Treasurer’s Office, and the custodian bank to determine if SB167/SJR6 would require an actual 
transfer of assets between accounts, which could potentially have small associated transaction 
costs. 
 
RELATIONSHIP 
 
This bill relates to SJR6, which proposes constitutional amendment to New Mexico voters that, if 
passed, would amend Article 20 of New Mexico’s Constitution by adding a new section that will 
make the early childhood trust fund a permanent fund in the state treasury that may be used  
only for prenatal programs and services and programs and services that serve children until they  
are eligible for kindergarten. 
 
TECHNICAL ISSUES 
 
SIC reports—because this bill changes the name of the current early childhood education and 
care fund in Section 9-29A-2 NMSA 1978 (recompiled as Section 6-4-35 NMSA 1978) to the 
early childhood trust fund but does not repeal the existing ECECF—it is unclear whether the 
temporary provision in Section 5 of SB167 to transfer the balance of the ECECF to the ECTF is 
necessary. 
 
 
KK/hj/hg/sgs